All Hands on Deck: The Sea as an Object to Rethink Migrations

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.4000/rccs.11873
Yvette Santos, Marta Nunes Silva
{"title":"All Hands on Deck: The Sea as an Object to Rethink Migrations","authors":"Yvette Santos, Marta Nunes Silva","doi":"10.4000/rccs.11873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The thematic dossier “All Hands on Deck: The Sea as an Object to Rethink Migrations” proposes an approach to different ways of understanding migratory movements through their presence at sea. This dossier is part of the oceanic turn, its focus being the sea and its methodology removing the exclusivity of land marked by a visible border. Thinking about the complexity that the sea represents in the past and in the present, it allows a polychromatic reading of the Human/Territory relationship as well as providing a reading of space and time. It is a unique space, of connections and interconnections, of obstacles, but, above all, of ambiguities, promoted by the action of those who cross it, those who want to control it or those who appropriate it only from the viewpoint of a dream, or else symbolically. Population movements, regardless of their nature or motivation, lead individuals, States or future nations to (re)interpret and (re)organise the spaces in which they interact, symbolically or materially. In this involve‐ ment of different geopolitical and ideological players and stakes, etched in long and suspended times and at multiple distances, it is necessary to question how and for what purposes the sea is appropriated, (re)defined or (re)constructed by the various historical subjects. We start from the idea that the sea is, simultaneously, a unique element and a creator of specificities, and that, as such, it is used by migratory movements as a means of fulfilling a trajectory, transmitting messages or signalling intentions, as we can see in the processes of construction of national identities. Now, the idiosyncrasies of the sea justify, from the out‐ set, that we challenge the definition of the maritime border itself, since we are facing chronologies where the original principle of freedom of the seas is already obsolete. As such, addressing the concept of a maritime border","PeriodicalId":54161,"journal":{"name":"Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.11873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thematic dossier “All Hands on Deck: The Sea as an Object to Rethink Migrations” proposes an approach to different ways of understanding migratory movements through their presence at sea. This dossier is part of the oceanic turn, its focus being the sea and its methodology removing the exclusivity of land marked by a visible border. Thinking about the complexity that the sea represents in the past and in the present, it allows a polychromatic reading of the Human/Territory relationship as well as providing a reading of space and time. It is a unique space, of connections and interconnections, of obstacles, but, above all, of ambiguities, promoted by the action of those who cross it, those who want to control it or those who appropriate it only from the viewpoint of a dream, or else symbolically. Population movements, regardless of their nature or motivation, lead individuals, States or future nations to (re)interpret and (re)organise the spaces in which they interact, symbolically or materially. In this involve‐ ment of different geopolitical and ideological players and stakes, etched in long and suspended times and at multiple distances, it is necessary to question how and for what purposes the sea is appropriated, (re)defined or (re)constructed by the various historical subjects. We start from the idea that the sea is, simultaneously, a unique element and a creator of specificities, and that, as such, it is used by migratory movements as a means of fulfilling a trajectory, transmitting messages or signalling intentions, as we can see in the processes of construction of national identities. Now, the idiosyncrasies of the sea justify, from the out‐ set, that we challenge the definition of the maritime border itself, since we are facing chronologies where the original principle of freedom of the seas is already obsolete. As such, addressing the concept of a maritime border
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
所有人都在甲板上:海洋是重新思考移民的对象
主题档案“所有人都在甲板上:海洋是重新思考移民的对象”提出了一种通过移民在海上的存在来理解移民运动的不同方式的方法。这份档案是海洋转向的一部分,其重点是海洋及其方法,消除了以可见边界为标志的土地的排他性。考虑到海洋在过去和现在所代表的复杂性,它允许对人类/领土关系进行多色解读,并提供对空间和时间的解读。这是一个独特的空间,有联系和相互联系,有障碍,但最重要的是,有模糊性,由那些跨越它的人、那些想控制它的人或那些只从梦想的角度或象征性地利用它的人的行动推动。人口流动,无论其性质或动机如何,都会导致个人、国家或未来国家(重新)解释和(重新)组织他们互动的空间,无论是象征性的还是物质性的。在涉及不同的地缘政治和意识形态参与者和利害关系的过程中,有必要质疑各种历史主体如何以及出于什么目的侵占、(重新)定义或(重新)建设海洋。我们的出发点是,海洋同时也是一个独特的元素和特殊性的创造者,因此,正如我们在构建国家身份的过程中看到的那样,它被移民运动用作实现轨迹、传递信息或发出意图的手段。现在,海洋的特殊性从一开始就证明,我们对海洋边界本身的定义提出了质疑,因为我们所面临的时代,最初的海洋自由原则已经过时。因此,处理海上边界的概念
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais
Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Movimiento indígena, ecologías y contrahegemonía en Nayarit (México) Título da Página Eletrónica: Arquivo.pt Transgressão e limites: intercetar as alternativas de género na vida social Título da Página Eletrónica: Portal da Oferta Formativa O urbano nas margens do campo: por uma sociologia dos espaços e vidas residuais
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1