OECD Ülkelerinde Satın Alma Gücü Paritesinin İncelenmesi: Doğrusal Olmayan Yapısal Kırılmalı Birim Kök Testinden Yeni Kanıtlar

IF 0.3 Q4 ECONOMICS Sosyoekonomi Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.03.02
M. Uğur, Ali Eren Alper
{"title":"OECD Ülkelerinde Satın Alma Gücü Paritesinin İncelenmesi: Doğrusal Olmayan Yapısal Kırılmalı Birim Kök Testinden Yeni Kanıtlar","authors":"M. Uğur, Ali Eren Alper","doi":"10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis for 38 OECD member countries over the period 1994:M1-2021:M9 by performing Hepsag’s (2021) unit root test. It fills the gap in the literature since it is one of the first studies conducted performing a unit root test that considers structural change and nonlinearity for all OECD countries. The study, in which conventional unit root tests such as the ADF, KPSS, and the Fourier KPSS, which allow merely structural change, yield conflicting results regarding the validity of the PPP hypothesis, determines that the PPP hypothesis is valid for countries with stationary real effective exchange rates at the level such as Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, Norway, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, and the USA according to Hepsag’s (2021) unit root test results.","PeriodicalId":42679,"journal":{"name":"Sosyoekonomi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sosyoekonomi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.03.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis for 38 OECD member countries over the period 1994:M1-2021:M9 by performing Hepsag’s (2021) unit root test. It fills the gap in the literature since it is one of the first studies conducted performing a unit root test that considers structural change and nonlinearity for all OECD countries. The study, in which conventional unit root tests such as the ADF, KPSS, and the Fourier KPSS, which allow merely structural change, yield conflicting results regarding the validity of the PPP hypothesis, determines that the PPP hypothesis is valid for countries with stationary real effective exchange rates at the level such as Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, Norway, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, and the USA according to Hepsag’s (2021) unit root test results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究旨在通过Hepsag(2021)单位根检验,调查1994:M1-2021:M9期间38个经合组织成员国的购买力平价假设。它填补了文献中的空白,因为它是第一批进行单位根测试的研究之一,该测试考虑了所有经合组织国家的结构变化和非线性。在这项研究中,传统的单位根检验,如ADF、KPSS和傅立叶KPSS,只允许结构变化,在购买力平价假设的有效性方面产生了相互矛盾的结果,确定购买力平价假说对实际有效汇率处于稳定水平的国家有效,如芬兰、法国、德国、希腊、匈牙利、冰岛、意大利、日本,根据Hepsag(2021)单位根试验结果,韩国、立陶宛、卢森堡、墨西哥、挪威、斯洛伐克、斯洛文尼亚、西班牙、瑞士、土耳其和美国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sosyoekonomi
Sosyoekonomi ECONOMICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Soviet Union's Five-Year Plans on Türkiye's First Five-Year Industrial Plan within the Context of Turkish-Russian Economic Relations Ekonomik Risk, Ekonomik Özgürlük İndeksi, Yolsuzluk Algısı İndeksi ve İnsani Gelişim İndeksi’nin Mekânsal Analizi The Effect of Real Wages on Employment after the Global Financial Crisis: The Case of the Turkish Manufacturing Industry Examining The Impact of Inflation on Financial Development in The Fragile Five Economies with Asymmetric Cointegration Tests Developing Countries’ Deadlock: What Does the Thirlwall's Law Offer Us?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1