VidAngel: Content filtering technologies, religion, and American copyright law

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION Internet Histories Pub Date : 2020-10-12 DOI:10.1080/24701475.2020.1831198
Gavin Feller, Andrew Ventimiglia
{"title":"VidAngel: Content filtering technologies, religion, and American copyright law","authors":"Gavin Feller, Andrew Ventimiglia","doi":"10.1080/24701475.2020.1831198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article traces a cultural history of the visual media filtering industry in the United States—from VHS tapes to internet filters to digital streaming platforms. Through an analysis of the company VidAngel, a video filtering start-up, and its recent copyright lawsuit brought by a group of major Hollywood film studios, we highlight the influential role that religion and copyright law, as interanimating forces, have played in the development of content identification and moderation technologies and practices. Emerging from this cultural history is a discourse that insists consumer rights to protect their families from morally objectionable content outweigh the copyrights of content creators. Used as a legal justification for content filtering, this family media rights discourse conflates personal moral decisions based on conservative religious values with neoliberal consumer empowerment in an effort to subvert hegemonic media systems by returning the power of media influence to private families in private settings. This article argues that religiously-motivated systems to identify and remove morally objectionable content have not only resulted in innovative business models targeting niche conservative religious audiences but that such businesses inevitably challenge and shape U.S. copyright law, significantly impacting several areas of contemporary media regulation well beyond the Mormon communities at the center of this narrative.","PeriodicalId":52252,"journal":{"name":"Internet Histories","volume":"5 1","pages":"8 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24701475.2020.1831198","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2020.1831198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This article traces a cultural history of the visual media filtering industry in the United States—from VHS tapes to internet filters to digital streaming platforms. Through an analysis of the company VidAngel, a video filtering start-up, and its recent copyright lawsuit brought by a group of major Hollywood film studios, we highlight the influential role that religion and copyright law, as interanimating forces, have played in the development of content identification and moderation technologies and practices. Emerging from this cultural history is a discourse that insists consumer rights to protect their families from morally objectionable content outweigh the copyrights of content creators. Used as a legal justification for content filtering, this family media rights discourse conflates personal moral decisions based on conservative religious values with neoliberal consumer empowerment in an effort to subvert hegemonic media systems by returning the power of media influence to private families in private settings. This article argues that religiously-motivated systems to identify and remove morally objectionable content have not only resulted in innovative business models targeting niche conservative religious audiences but that such businesses inevitably challenge and shape U.S. copyright law, significantly impacting several areas of contemporary media regulation well beyond the Mormon communities at the center of this narrative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内容过滤技术、宗教和美国版权法
本文追溯了美国视觉媒体过滤行业的文化历史——从VHS磁带到互联网过滤器再到数字流媒体平台。通过对视频过滤初创公司VidAngel及其最近由好莱坞主要电影制片厂提起的版权诉讼的分析,我们强调宗教和版权法作为相互作用的力量,在内容识别和审核技术和实践的发展中发挥了重要作用。从这段文化历史中出现的是一种话语,它坚持认为消费者保护家人免受道德上令人反感的内容侵害的权利比内容创作者的版权更重要。作为内容过滤的法律理由,这种家庭媒体权利话语将基于保守宗教价值观的个人道德决定与新自由主义消费者赋权混为一谈,试图通过将媒体影响力归还给私人环境中的私人家庭来颠覆霸权媒体体系。本文认为,以宗教为动机的识别和删除道德上令人反感的内容的系统不仅导致了针对利基保守宗教受众的创新商业模式,而且这些业务不可避免地挑战和塑造了美国版权法,显著影响了当代媒体监管的几个领域,远远超出了这一叙述的中心摩门教社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Histories
Internet Histories Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
The Two Revolutions: A History of the Transgender Internet, by Avery Dame-Griff The Two Revolutions: A History of the Transgender Internet , by Avery Dame-Griff, New York, New York University Press, 2023. 272 pp., ISBN 9781479818310, $30 ­(paperback), $89 (hardcover) Early virtual science museums: when the technology is not mature Framing digital identities through social media in museums Digital Pierrot Museum from Pristina to the Moon: an interview with Willred Dallto An analysis of the role of digital technology in the online exhibition of the art museum in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1