The impact of tillage practices on daytime CO2 fluxes, evapotranspiration (ET), and water-use efficiency in peanut

IF 3.5 Q1 AGRONOMY Frontiers in Agronomy Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.3389/fagro.2023.1228407
Sujata Bogati, Monique Y. Leclerc, Gengsheng Zhang, Sukhvir Kaur Brar, Ronald Scott Tubbs, Walter Scott Monfort, Gary Lawrence Hawkins
{"title":"The impact of tillage practices on daytime CO2 fluxes, evapotranspiration (ET), and water-use efficiency in peanut","authors":"Sujata Bogati, Monique Y. Leclerc, Gengsheng Zhang, Sukhvir Kaur Brar, Ronald Scott Tubbs, Walter Scott Monfort, Gary Lawrence Hawkins","doi":"10.3389/fagro.2023.1228407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) growers use different tillage systems in the Southeastern United States, the impact of which needs to be assessed with regard to evapotranspiration (ET), carbon uptake, and water-use efficiency (WUE). The eddy-covariance method was used to measure these fluxes in peanut in two common tillage systems (strip tillage vs. conventional tillage) over the course of three consecutive growing seasons (2019–2021). Results suggest that during the dry year of 2019 with rainfall of only 30 cm, strip tillage peanut had a significantly higher daytime ecosystem WUE, 105%, 51%, and 32% higher than that of the conventional tillage in early, mid, and late growth stages, respectively. In 2020, with mean rainfall the overall difference in average WUE was nonsignificant between the tillage systems. Heavy rainfall of 112 cm in 2021 led to waterlogged conditions in the conventional tillage field due to poorer infiltration. This likely reduced the CO2 uptake. Waterlogging did not occur in the strip tillage field due to improved infiltration. As a result, in 2021, 18%, 33%, and 48% greater ecosystem WUE in strip tillage during early, mid, and later stages was found. Thus, this study suggests that strip tillage fields can achieve higher net CO2 uptake and WUE in Georgia during dry or very wet years. However, no difference in WUE was found between different tillage systems in a typical year with average rainfall for Georgia. The present study has implications for regions characterized by long growing seasons and low rainfall.","PeriodicalId":34038,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Agronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1228407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) growers use different tillage systems in the Southeastern United States, the impact of which needs to be assessed with regard to evapotranspiration (ET), carbon uptake, and water-use efficiency (WUE). The eddy-covariance method was used to measure these fluxes in peanut in two common tillage systems (strip tillage vs. conventional tillage) over the course of three consecutive growing seasons (2019–2021). Results suggest that during the dry year of 2019 with rainfall of only 30 cm, strip tillage peanut had a significantly higher daytime ecosystem WUE, 105%, 51%, and 32% higher than that of the conventional tillage in early, mid, and late growth stages, respectively. In 2020, with mean rainfall the overall difference in average WUE was nonsignificant between the tillage systems. Heavy rainfall of 112 cm in 2021 led to waterlogged conditions in the conventional tillage field due to poorer infiltration. This likely reduced the CO2 uptake. Waterlogging did not occur in the strip tillage field due to improved infiltration. As a result, in 2021, 18%, 33%, and 48% greater ecosystem WUE in strip tillage during early, mid, and later stages was found. Thus, this study suggests that strip tillage fields can achieve higher net CO2 uptake and WUE in Georgia during dry or very wet years. However, no difference in WUE was found between different tillage systems in a typical year with average rainfall for Georgia. The present study has implications for regions characterized by long growing seasons and low rainfall.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同耕作方式对花生白天CO2通量、蒸散量和水分利用效率的影响
在美国东南部,花生(arachhis hypogaea L.)种植者使用不同的耕作制度,需要对其蒸散发(ET)、碳吸收和水利用效率(WUE)的影响进行评估。在连续三个生长季节(2019-2021年)中,采用涡旋协方差法测量了两种常见耕作制度(带状耕作与常规耕作)下花生的这些通量。结果表明,在2019年干旱年降雨量仅为30 cm时,花生生长前期、中期和后期,带状耕作的白天生态系统WUE分别比常规耕作高105%、51%和32%。2020年,在平均降雨条件下,不同耕作方式间的平均水分利用效率总体差异不显著。2021年112厘米的强降雨导致常规耕作田因入渗较差而发生涝灾。这可能会减少二氧化碳的吸收。由于渗滤改善,带状耕作田未发生内涝。结果表明,在2021年,带状耕作的早期、中期和后期生态系统WUE分别提高了18%、33%和48%。因此,本研究表明,在干旱或非常潮湿的年份,条带耕作田可以实现更高的净二氧化碳吸收量和WUE。然而,在佐治亚州平均降雨量的典型年份,不同耕作制度之间的WUE没有差异。本研究对生长季节长、降雨少的地区具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Agronomy
Frontiers in Agronomy Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
123
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Benefits of Canavalia ensiformis, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and mineral fertilizer management in tobacco production Weed resistance prediction: a random forest analysis based on field histories Nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization dynamics in human excreta-derived fertilizers Exploring adaptation strategies for smallholder farmers in dryland farming systems and impact on pearl millet production under climate change in West Africa Effect of rainfall interception and resting period on the soil seed bank
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1