Teachers’ digital competences in higher education in Portugal and Spain

IF 2.4 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Contemporary Educational Technology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.30935/cedtech/13604
Sara Dias-Trindade, J. Moreira, Juan Gabriel García Huertas, Pablo Garrido Pintado, Ana Mas Miguel
{"title":"Teachers’ digital competences in higher education in Portugal and Spain","authors":"Sara Dias-Trindade, J. Moreira, Juan Gabriel García Huertas, Pablo Garrido Pintado, Ana Mas Miguel","doi":"10.30935/cedtech/13604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential of DTIC has brought new and emerging challenges to teachers, making it essential to acquire digital competences, especially in virtual learning environments and online technologies. In this sense, based on the DigCompEdu CheckIn self-assessment questionnaire, validated for the Portuguese population by earlier studies, this research aims to identify the most fragile and robust areas of digital competences of Portuguese and Spanish university teachers. The quantitative methodological approach emphasizes teachers’ perception of their digital competences in three dimensions: teachers’ professional competences, teachers’ pedagogical competences and students’ competences and involved 347 teachers from Portugal and Spain. The results show that teachers of the two institutions have an overall moderate level of digital proficiency–level B1 and B2–and that the differences encountered between Portuguese and Spanish teachers (for example, Portuguese teachers have level A2 in area 4–assessment–, while Spanish teachers are already at level B2) highlight the need to invest in specific training that may address specific frailties, and therefore allow for the promotion of their digital competences. Results relating to teaching experience and age show that there is no direct relation between either factor or being digitally competent. Regarding gender, results reveal that men had slightly better results than women. Overall, what the results show is the need for teachers to increase the level of digital competence through specific training, prepared according to the specificities of each institution, and the importance of developing public policies that prepare teachers for a more digital education.","PeriodicalId":37088,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential of DTIC has brought new and emerging challenges to teachers, making it essential to acquire digital competences, especially in virtual learning environments and online technologies. In this sense, based on the DigCompEdu CheckIn self-assessment questionnaire, validated for the Portuguese population by earlier studies, this research aims to identify the most fragile and robust areas of digital competences of Portuguese and Spanish university teachers. The quantitative methodological approach emphasizes teachers’ perception of their digital competences in three dimensions: teachers’ professional competences, teachers’ pedagogical competences and students’ competences and involved 347 teachers from Portugal and Spain. The results show that teachers of the two institutions have an overall moderate level of digital proficiency–level B1 and B2–and that the differences encountered between Portuguese and Spanish teachers (for example, Portuguese teachers have level A2 in area 4–assessment–, while Spanish teachers are already at level B2) highlight the need to invest in specific training that may address specific frailties, and therefore allow for the promotion of their digital competences. Results relating to teaching experience and age show that there is no direct relation between either factor or being digitally competent. Regarding gender, results reveal that men had slightly better results than women. Overall, what the results show is the need for teachers to increase the level of digital competence through specific training, prepared according to the specificities of each institution, and the importance of developing public policies that prepare teachers for a more digital education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙和西班牙高等教育中教师的数字能力
DTIC的潜力给教师带来了新的挑战,使他们必须获得数字能力,特别是在虚拟学习环境和在线技术中。从这个意义上说,基于DigCompEdu CheckIn自我评估问卷,通过早期的研究对葡萄牙人口进行验证,本研究旨在确定葡萄牙和西班牙大学教师数字能力最脆弱和最强大的领域。定量方法方法强调教师在三个维度上对其数字能力的感知:教师的专业能力、教师的教学能力和学生的能力,涉及来自葡萄牙和西班牙的347名教师。结果表明,这两所学校的教师总体上的数字熟练程度为B1和B2级,葡萄牙语教师和西班牙语教师之间的差异(例如,葡萄牙语教师在4级评估中达到A2级,而西班牙语教师已经达到B2级)突出了投资于特定培训的必要性,这些培训可能会解决特定的弱点,从而促进他们的数字能力。与教学经验和年龄相关的结果表明,这两个因素与数字能力之间没有直接关系。在性别方面,结果显示男性的结果略好于女性。总体而言,结果表明,教师需要通过根据每个机构的具体情况准备的具体培训来提高数字能力水平,以及制定公共政策使教师为更加数字化的教育做好准备的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Technology
Contemporary Educational Technology Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Design-based approach to technology innovation: Teacher educators’ experiences with tablets as instructional tools in South Africa Exploring the effectiveness of digital writing tools on Thai EFL students’ writing How will education look like in the future? School teachers’ perceived knowledge and affordances for using technology in teaching Enhancing mathematics education in the UAE: Elementary teachers’ views on distance education methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1