Joseph Brodsky’s ‘Unknown Mandelstam’

4区 文学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/10611975.2021.1872329
L. Katsis
{"title":"Joseph Brodsky’s ‘Unknown Mandelstam’","authors":"L. Katsis","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2021.1872329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores a section of the transcript of Joseph Brodsky’s presentation at the 1991 conference on the centenary of Osip Mandelstam in London. It analyzes Brodsky’s position opposing the established view that Mandelstam’s ‘Ode’ to Stalin was an ‘illness.’ It analyzes and comments on Brodsky’s oral statements on the subject, made during the opponents’ presentations at the conference that specifically addressed this work.","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611975.2021.1872329","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2021.1872329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores a section of the transcript of Joseph Brodsky’s presentation at the 1991 conference on the centenary of Osip Mandelstam in London. It analyzes Brodsky’s position opposing the established view that Mandelstam’s ‘Ode’ to Stalin was an ‘illness.’ It analyzes and comments on Brodsky’s oral statements on the subject, made during the opponents’ presentations at the conference that specifically addressed this work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要本文探讨了Joseph Brodsky在1991年伦敦Osip Mandelstam百年大会上的演讲记录。它分析了布罗茨基反对曼德尔斯坦的《斯大林颂》是一种“疾病”的既定观点的立场它分析并评论了Brodsky在专门讨论这项工作的会议上反对者的陈述中就这一主题所作的口头陈述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE
RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Literature publishes high-quality, annotated translations of Russian literary criticism and scholarship on contemporary works and popular cultural topics as well as the classics. Selections are drawn from the leading literary periodicals including Literaturnaia gazeta (Literary Gazette), Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (New Literary Review), Oktiabr (October), Voprosy literatury (Problems of Literature), and Znamia (Banner). An editorial introduction to every issue provides context and insight that will be helpful for English-language readers.
期刊最新文献
Krylov and Many Others: The Genesis and Meaning of Russia’s First Literary Jubilee The Politics of Polyphony: Dangerous Modernity and the Structure of the Novel in Dostoevsky and Bakhtin Illegal Literature for the Masses: The Imaginary and Real Reader “The Truth Had Been Twisted and Contorted”: Toward a Pragmatics of F. M. Dostoevsky’s The Landlady Jakobson’s Hypothesis, Gleb / Ivanovich, and Perversion: G. Uspenskii’s Madness and His Short Story “Straightened”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1