Footpaths of the Late-Soviet Environmental Turn: The “Forest City” of Novosibirsk’s Akademgorodok as a Sociotechnical Imaginary

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY Soviet and Post Soviet Review Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI:10.30965/18763324-bja10043
Roman Bugaev, M. Piskunov, T. Rakov
{"title":"Footpaths of the Late-Soviet Environmental Turn: The “Forest City” of Novosibirsk’s Akademgorodok as a Sociotechnical Imaginary","authors":"Roman Bugaev, M. Piskunov, T. Rakov","doi":"10.30965/18763324-bja10043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe founding of Akademgorodok near Novosibirsk in the late 1950s features prominently in the historiography of the Thaw and the general turn of Soviet science to the eastern parts of the country. This article puts this story into the context of the formation of modern “green” ideas in the late Soviet Union and reconsiders the relationship between humans and nature, along with the definition of nature itself. Akademgorodok produced a telling visual perspective: the architectural plan for the city dictated that its scientific, industrial, and living zones were drowned deep in the taiga. Architects named this type of urban planning “diffusive,” and memoirists described it as a “Forest City.” Using the term of Sheila Jasanoff, we designate this “Forest City” as a sociotechnical imaginary of Akademgorodok.\nOur aim is to study the historical roots of the “Forest City” and how it became a collective imaginary. How did it happen that in the 1950s and 1960s, when the “faces” of Soviet cities were defined by districts of standard panel houses, that a city was built near Novosibirsk in which so much attention was given to pre-human flora, fauna, and landscapes? What ideas and intellectual contexts composed the concept of Akademgorodok as a “Forest City”? Our answer possesses two dimensions. First, the rejection of the use of decorative elements in housing construction in the post-Stalin epoch stimulated architects to pay more attention to the greening of cities. They revived the concept of a “garden city” proposed by Ebenezer Howard on a new level. Second, the evolution of the ideas of Mikhail Lavrentyev, the founder of Akademgorodok, who upon arrival in Siberia applied the productivist program manifested in the slogan “Siberia is a treasure of resources,” but later changed his opinion to more “green” views under the influence of the so-called “Baikal Discussion.” The viewpoints of Lavrentyev influenced the design of this “center” of Siberian science, and then he formulated the idea of a “Forest City.” These contexts enable the utopian horizons and the search for models of a constructed future that were typical of the Thaw era to reflect upon the important challenges of the contemporary Anthropocene.","PeriodicalId":41969,"journal":{"name":"Soviet and Post Soviet Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet and Post Soviet Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763324-bja10043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The founding of Akademgorodok near Novosibirsk in the late 1950s features prominently in the historiography of the Thaw and the general turn of Soviet science to the eastern parts of the country. This article puts this story into the context of the formation of modern “green” ideas in the late Soviet Union and reconsiders the relationship between humans and nature, along with the definition of nature itself. Akademgorodok produced a telling visual perspective: the architectural plan for the city dictated that its scientific, industrial, and living zones were drowned deep in the taiga. Architects named this type of urban planning “diffusive,” and memoirists described it as a “Forest City.” Using the term of Sheila Jasanoff, we designate this “Forest City” as a sociotechnical imaginary of Akademgorodok. Our aim is to study the historical roots of the “Forest City” and how it became a collective imaginary. How did it happen that in the 1950s and 1960s, when the “faces” of Soviet cities were defined by districts of standard panel houses, that a city was built near Novosibirsk in which so much attention was given to pre-human flora, fauna, and landscapes? What ideas and intellectual contexts composed the concept of Akademgorodok as a “Forest City”? Our answer possesses two dimensions. First, the rejection of the use of decorative elements in housing construction in the post-Stalin epoch stimulated architects to pay more attention to the greening of cities. They revived the concept of a “garden city” proposed by Ebenezer Howard on a new level. Second, the evolution of the ideas of Mikhail Lavrentyev, the founder of Akademgorodok, who upon arrival in Siberia applied the productivist program manifested in the slogan “Siberia is a treasure of resources,” but later changed his opinion to more “green” views under the influence of the so-called “Baikal Discussion.” The viewpoints of Lavrentyev influenced the design of this “center” of Siberian science, and then he formulated the idea of a “Forest City.” These contexts enable the utopian horizons and the search for models of a constructed future that were typical of the Thaw era to reflect upon the important challenges of the contemporary Anthropocene.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏联后期环境转向的路径:作为社会技术想象的新西伯利亚学院的“森林城市”
20世纪50年代末,在新西伯利亚附近建立的戈罗多克学院,在解冻的历史编纂和苏联科学向该国东部地区的总体转向中占有突出地位。本文将这个故事置于苏联后期现代“绿色”理念形成的背景下,重新思考人与自然的关系,以及自然本身的定义。Akademgorodok产生了一个生动的视觉视角:城市的建筑规划决定了它的科学、工业和生活区被淹没在针叶林深处。建筑师将这种类型的城市规划命名为“扩散”,而回忆录作者则将其描述为“森林城市”。使用Sheila Jasanoff的术语,我们将这个“森林城市”指定为Akademgorodok的社会技术想象。我们的目的是研究“森林城市”的历史根源,以及它是如何成为一个集体想象的。在20世纪50年代和60年代,当苏联城市的“面貌”由标准的面板房屋区定义时,在新西伯利亚附近建造了一座城市,其中如此关注人类出现之前的动植物和景观,这是怎么发生的?Akademgorodok作为“森林城市”的概念是由什么样的思想和知识背景构成的?我们的答案包含两个维度。首先,后斯大林时代对住宅建筑中使用装饰元素的拒绝刺激了建筑师更加关注城市的绿化。他们将埃比尼泽·霍华德提出的“花园城市”的概念重新发扬光大。二是科学院创始人拉夫连季耶夫思想的演变。拉夫连季耶夫一到西伯利亚就实行生产主义纲领,其口号是“西伯利亚是资源的宝库”,但后来在所谓的“贝加尔湖讨论”的影响下,他的思想转变为更“绿色”的观点。拉夫连季耶夫的观点影响了这个西伯利亚科学“中心”的设计,然后他提出了“森林城市”的想法。这些背景使得乌托邦的视野和对典型的融冰时代构建的未来模型的探索能够反映当代人类世的重要挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The Bloomsbury Handbook of the Russian Revolution, edited by Geoffrey Swain, et al. Editor’s Note Stalin: Piat’let Grazhdanskoi voiny i gosudarstvennogo stroitel’stva, 1917–1922 gg, written by Il’ia S. Rat’kovskii Authoritarian Laughter: Political Humor and Soviet Dystopia in Lithuania, written by Neringa Klumbytė Stalin as Warlord, written by Alfred J. Rieber
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1