The Foreign Subsidies Regulation: Calling Foul While Upping the Ante?

J. Blockx, P. Mattiolo
{"title":"The Foreign Subsidies Regulation: Calling Foul While Upping the Ante?","authors":"J. Blockx, P. Mattiolo","doi":"10.54648/eerr2023014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EU Regulation 2022/2560 on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market (the Foreign Subsidies Regulation, FSR) is a unilateral tool designed to fill a perceived regulatory gap in the existing EU and WTO rules on foreign subsidies. After a description of the new Regulation, this paper demonstrates that the FSR follows in the footsteps of a long European tradition of scepticism towards EU Member State subsidization in the internal market, but that it also arises in a context where the EU’s approach to subsidization as a tool in international trade has been more ambiguous, combining initiatives to fight government subsidies (the ‘defensive’ approach) with examples of the active use and promotion of subsidization (the ‘offensive’ approach). The paper subsequently aims to forecast how the FSR’s implementation will be affected by contextual factors, such as the perceived crisis of globalization and the crisis of the WTO, and the resurgence of industrial policy in the United States (e.g., the US Inflation Reduction Act) and in the EU itself (where various recent initiatives facilitate the granting of subsidies), as well as by factors internal to the Regulation, such as its dependence on policy choices and certain practical challenges to its application.\nFSR, subsidies, state aid, competition, international trade, industrial policy, WTO","PeriodicalId":84710,"journal":{"name":"European foreign affairs review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European foreign affairs review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2023014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

EU Regulation 2022/2560 on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market (the Foreign Subsidies Regulation, FSR) is a unilateral tool designed to fill a perceived regulatory gap in the existing EU and WTO rules on foreign subsidies. After a description of the new Regulation, this paper demonstrates that the FSR follows in the footsteps of a long European tradition of scepticism towards EU Member State subsidization in the internal market, but that it also arises in a context where the EU’s approach to subsidization as a tool in international trade has been more ambiguous, combining initiatives to fight government subsidies (the ‘defensive’ approach) with examples of the active use and promotion of subsidization (the ‘offensive’ approach). The paper subsequently aims to forecast how the FSR’s implementation will be affected by contextual factors, such as the perceived crisis of globalization and the crisis of the WTO, and the resurgence of industrial policy in the United States (e.g., the US Inflation Reduction Act) and in the EU itself (where various recent initiatives facilitate the granting of subsidies), as well as by factors internal to the Regulation, such as its dependence on policy choices and certain practical challenges to its application. FSR, subsidies, state aid, competition, international trade, industrial policy, WTO
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外国补贴条例:在提高补贴的同时叫嚣犯规?
欧盟关于扭曲内部市场的外国补贴的第2022/2560号条例(《外国补贴条例》)是一种单方面工具,旨在填补欧盟和世贸组织现有外国补贴规则中的监管空白。在对新法规进行描述后,本文表明,FSR沿袭了欧洲长期以来对欧盟成员国在内部市场补贴持怀疑态度的传统,但它也出现在欧盟将补贴作为国际贸易工具的做法更加模糊的背景下,将反对政府补贴的举措(“防御性”方法)与积极使用和促进补贴的例子(“进攻性”方法)相结合。随后,本文旨在预测FSR的实施将如何受到背景因素的影响,如全球化危机和世贸组织危机,以及美国(如美国《通胀削减法案》)和欧盟本身(最近的各种举措促进了补贴的发放)产业政策的复苏,以及《条例》内部的因素,如对政策选择的依赖性和对其应用的某些实际挑战。FSR、补贴、国家援助、竞争、国际贸易、产业政策、WTO
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Fast and Furious? A Quick Digest of a Plan for the Accelerated Integration of Candidate Countries into the EU The EU’s Vaccine Diplomacy in the WHO The Compatibility of the ISDS Mechanism under the Energy Charter Treaty With the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order European Defence Union ASAP: The Act in Support of Ammunition Production and the development of EU defence capabilities in response to the war in Ukraine Who is really affected by European Union terrorist sanctions? A Critical Study on ‘Proximity’ in EU Case Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1