Do Metrics Drive News Decisions? Political News Journalists’ Exposure and Attitudes Toward Web Analytics

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Electronic News Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1177/19312431211018141
Kenza Lamot, Steve Paulussen, Peter van Aelst
{"title":"Do Metrics Drive News Decisions? Political News Journalists’ Exposure and Attitudes Toward Web Analytics","authors":"Kenza Lamot, Steve Paulussen, Peter van Aelst","doi":"10.1177/19312431211018141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As newsrooms are increasingly using web analytics to monitor news behavior, journalism is likely to become increasingly “metrics-driven.” Research suggests that analytics are commonly used by web editors to decide on the distribution and promotion of news stories, but how does this affect the news practices of journalists? To what extent are audience metrics taken into account by individual journalists and reporters who work in a specific news beat? This paper explores this question through a survey of political journalists in Belgium. The study examines the level of access that political news journalists have to audience metrics, and to what extent their level of exposure to and use of metrics affects their attitudes toward analytics in news work. Results show that while three quarters of the political news journalists are nowadays exposed to audience metrics on a regular basis, more than half of them report to never make direct use of web metrics in their daily work. Younger journalists are more likely to be exposed and to use web metrics than their senior colleagues, but journalists working for commercial media do not use metrics more intensely than journalists from public service media. Journalists who actively use metrics themselves tend to hold more positive attitudes toward web metrics, whereas the passive exposure to metrics seems to make journalists more skeptical or negative about them.","PeriodicalId":29929,"journal":{"name":"Electronic News","volume":"15 1","pages":"3 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/19312431211018141","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431211018141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

As newsrooms are increasingly using web analytics to monitor news behavior, journalism is likely to become increasingly “metrics-driven.” Research suggests that analytics are commonly used by web editors to decide on the distribution and promotion of news stories, but how does this affect the news practices of journalists? To what extent are audience metrics taken into account by individual journalists and reporters who work in a specific news beat? This paper explores this question through a survey of political journalists in Belgium. The study examines the level of access that political news journalists have to audience metrics, and to what extent their level of exposure to and use of metrics affects their attitudes toward analytics in news work. Results show that while three quarters of the political news journalists are nowadays exposed to audience metrics on a regular basis, more than half of them report to never make direct use of web metrics in their daily work. Younger journalists are more likely to be exposed and to use web metrics than their senior colleagues, but journalists working for commercial media do not use metrics more intensely than journalists from public service media. Journalists who actively use metrics themselves tend to hold more positive attitudes toward web metrics, whereas the passive exposure to metrics seems to make journalists more skeptical or negative about them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量标准是否推动新闻决策?政治新闻记者的曝光率和对网络分析的态度
随着新闻编辑室越来越多地使用网络分析来监控新闻行为,新闻业很可能变得越来越“以指标为导向”。研究表明,网络编辑通常使用分析来决定新闻故事的分发和推广,但这如何影响记者的新闻实践?在特定新闻领域工作的个别记者和记者在多大程度上考虑了受众指标?本文通过对比利时政治记者的调查来探讨这个问题。该研究考察了政治新闻记者接触受众指标的程度,以及他们接触和使用指标的程度在多大程度上影响了他们对新闻工作中分析的态度。结果显示,虽然目前有四分之三的政治新闻记者定期接触受众指标,但其中一半以上的人表示从未在日常工作中直接使用网络指标。年轻的记者比他们的资深同事更有可能接触和使用网络指标,但为商业媒体工作的记者并不比公共服务媒体的记者更频繁地使用指标。主动使用指标的记者往往对网络指标持更积极的态度,而被动接触指标的记者似乎更怀疑或消极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic News
Electronic News COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Does Tribe Trump Facts? Novel Measures of Hostile Media The Social Media Comment Section as an Unruly Public Arena: How Comment Reading Erodes Trust in News Media Innovation and Determination: How Local American TV Journalists Told the COVID-19 “Story of a Lifetime” “Standard” Appearance and “Accentless” Speech: How Performance Neutrality Limits Diversity in Broadcast News Attitudes of U.S. Public Broadcasters: A Liberal Helping of Interpretive Journalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1