Improving policy environments for infants and young children: global status of multisectoral national policies for early childhood development

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-23 DOI:10.1080/17450128.2022.2067382
E. Vargas-Barón, K. Diehl, J. Small
{"title":"Improving policy environments for infants and young children: global status of multisectoral national policies for early childhood development","authors":"E. Vargas-Barón, K. Diehl, J. Small","doi":"10.1080/17450128.2022.2067382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Multisectoral national policies for early childhood development (ECD) have been developed since 1979, yet until now the number of countries adopting them has not been systematically documented. Numerous global declarations, including Education for All and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), have supported ECD policy planning. Selection and search criteria were established and applied to identify and classify multisectoral ECD policy documents. A descriptive study was conducted to assess historical trends in policy adoption, regional coverage, income levels, governance categories, and crisis countries. Policies were first developed in Colombia, and later in Namibia, South Africa, Mauritius and Maldives. By December 2019, 76 countries (39% of 197 countries worldwide) and one territory had adopted 125 multisectoral ECD policy instruments. Of them, 51% were policies; 37% strategies and/or action plans; 11% laws; and 7% regulatory documents. By 2010, 43 countries had adopted an ECD policy instrument, peaking in 2011 when 14 countries adopted policies. From 2012 to 2019, 29 countries adopted a policy. South Asia (88%), Latin America and the Caribbean (65%), and Sub-Saharan Africa (58%) lead policy development. Policies have been adopted by 53% of low-income countries and 55% of lower middle-income countries. Fewer upper middle-income countries (38%) and high-income countries (14%) have adopted an ECD policy. Previous research found that countries using participatory policy planning processes resulted in well-implemented ECD policies. The presence of a multisectoral ECD policy prepared in a participatory manner helps establish a strong enabling environment for expanding and improving ECD services. To attain SDG 4.2, additional lower- and middle-income countries, countries with emergencies, and authoritarian regimes should be prioritized for support. Finally, we recommend an indicator be established to identify the number of countries that have adopted ECD policies to help measure SDG 4.2. Key messages This study provides, for the first time, a criteria-based list of multisectoral national policies for early childhood development (ECD) in 76 countries (39% of 197 countries worldwide) and one territory and examines regional policy coverage and needs. Initial studies reveal the development, adoption, and implementation of multisectoral national ECD policies help expand ECD programs in countries. More technical assistance is needed to develop and implement ECD policies, especially in lower- and middle-income countries, including those with humanitarian emergencies and authoritarian regimes. A new SDG indicator for multisectoral national ECD policy development is recommended for future use. More research is required regarding policy impacts in relation to methods and processes of policy development, structures, key elements, and contents.","PeriodicalId":46101,"journal":{"name":"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"193 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2067382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multisectoral national policies for early childhood development (ECD) have been developed since 1979, yet until now the number of countries adopting them has not been systematically documented. Numerous global declarations, including Education for All and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), have supported ECD policy planning. Selection and search criteria were established and applied to identify and classify multisectoral ECD policy documents. A descriptive study was conducted to assess historical trends in policy adoption, regional coverage, income levels, governance categories, and crisis countries. Policies were first developed in Colombia, and later in Namibia, South Africa, Mauritius and Maldives. By December 2019, 76 countries (39% of 197 countries worldwide) and one territory had adopted 125 multisectoral ECD policy instruments. Of them, 51% were policies; 37% strategies and/or action plans; 11% laws; and 7% regulatory documents. By 2010, 43 countries had adopted an ECD policy instrument, peaking in 2011 when 14 countries adopted policies. From 2012 to 2019, 29 countries adopted a policy. South Asia (88%), Latin America and the Caribbean (65%), and Sub-Saharan Africa (58%) lead policy development. Policies have been adopted by 53% of low-income countries and 55% of lower middle-income countries. Fewer upper middle-income countries (38%) and high-income countries (14%) have adopted an ECD policy. Previous research found that countries using participatory policy planning processes resulted in well-implemented ECD policies. The presence of a multisectoral ECD policy prepared in a participatory manner helps establish a strong enabling environment for expanding and improving ECD services. To attain SDG 4.2, additional lower- and middle-income countries, countries with emergencies, and authoritarian regimes should be prioritized for support. Finally, we recommend an indicator be established to identify the number of countries that have adopted ECD policies to help measure SDG 4.2. Key messages This study provides, for the first time, a criteria-based list of multisectoral national policies for early childhood development (ECD) in 76 countries (39% of 197 countries worldwide) and one territory and examines regional policy coverage and needs. Initial studies reveal the development, adoption, and implementation of multisectoral national ECD policies help expand ECD programs in countries. More technical assistance is needed to develop and implement ECD policies, especially in lower- and middle-income countries, including those with humanitarian emergencies and authoritarian regimes. A new SDG indicator for multisectoral national ECD policy development is recommended for future use. More research is required regarding policy impacts in relation to methods and processes of policy development, structures, key elements, and contents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善婴幼儿政策环境:促进幼儿发展的多部门国家政策的全球现状
自1979年以来,儿童早期发展的多部门国家政策已经制定,但到目前为止,采用这些政策的国家数量还没有系统的记录。包括全民教育和可持续发展目标在内的许多全球宣言都支持幼儿发展政策规划。制定了筛选和检索标准,并将其应用于确定和分类多部门幼儿发展政策文件。进行了一项描述性研究,以评估政策采用、区域覆盖率、收入水平、治理类别和危机国家的历史趋势。政策最初在哥伦比亚制定,后来在纳米比亚、南非、毛里求斯和马尔代夫制定。截至2019年12月,76个国家(占全球197个国家的39%)和一个地区通过了125项多部门幼儿发展政策文书。其中51%是政策;37%的战略和/或行动计划;11%的法律;以及7%的监管文件。截至2010年,已有43个国家通过了幼儿发展政策工具,2011年达到峰值,当时有14个国家通过政策。从2012年到2019年,29个国家通过了一项政策。南亚(88%)、拉丁美洲和加勒比(65%)以及撒哈拉以南非洲(58%)主导政策制定。53%的低收入国家和55%的中低收入国家采取了政策。采用幼儿发展政策的中等偏上收入国家(38%)和高收入国家(14%)较少。先前的研究发现,采用参与性政策规划程序的国家能够很好地实施幼儿发展政策。以参与方式制定的多部门幼儿发展政策有助于为扩大和改善幼儿发展服务创造一个强有力的有利环境。为了实现可持续发展目标4.2,应优先支持更多的中低收入国家、有紧急情况的国家和独裁政权。最后,我们建议建立一个指标,以确定采用经合组织政策来帮助衡量可持续发展目标4.2的国家数量。关键信息本研究首次提供了76个国家(占全球197个国家的39%)和一个地区基于标准的多部门幼儿发展国家政策清单,并审查了区域政策的覆盖范围和需求。初步研究表明,多部门国家幼儿发展政策的制定、采用和实施有助于扩大各国的幼儿发展计划。需要更多的技术援助来制定和实施幼儿发展政策,特别是在中低收入国家,包括那些有人道主义紧急情况和独裁政权的国家。建议未来使用一个新的可持续发展目标指标,用于制定多部门国家幼儿发展政策。需要对政策影响进行更多的研究,涉及政策制定的方法和过程、结构、关键要素和内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies is an essential peer-reviewed journal analyzing psychological, sociological, health, gender, cultural, economic, and educational aspects of children and adolescents in developed and developing countries. This international publication forum provides a much-needed interdisciplinary focus on vulnerable children and youth at risk, specifically in relation to health and welfare issues, such as mental health, illness (including HIV/AIDS), disability, abuse, neglect, institutionalization, poverty, orphanhood, exploitation, war, famine, and disaster.
期刊最新文献
Assessing depression, suicidal behaviors and quality of life in adolescents with chronic illness: the potential role of SDQ-DP scores Assessment of family functioning in adolescents who use substances- a cross-sectional comparative study Condom use correlates among youth living with HIV in South Africa: lessons for promoting safer sex Parenting practices and adolescents’ mental health: Serial mediation by parental acceptance and adolescents’ grit Examining HIV-stigma interventions among youth living in sub-Sahara Africa: a systematic review of the evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1