Peace between Peace(s)? Urban Peace and the Coexistence of Antagonists in City Spaces

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/17502977.2022.2129330
I. Gusic
{"title":"Peace between Peace(s)? Urban Peace and the Coexistence of Antagonists in City Spaces","authors":"I. Gusic","doi":"10.1080/17502977.2022.2129330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The plurality and subjectivity of peace means that transitions from war are contested – i.e. permeated by conflicts between previously warring antagonists who want to (re)order postwar society according to competing peace(s). But while there always will exist mutually excluding peace(s), such outliers do not foreclose middle grounds where multiple peace(s) can coexist. In this article, I argue that the postwar city can generate coexistence between peace(s) of varying divergence through the creativity, accommodation, and fragmentation of city spaces. These arguments are illustrated through examples from postwar Belfast, Mitrovica, and Mostar. I term this conceptualization urban peace.","PeriodicalId":46629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding","volume":"16 1","pages":"619 - 640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2022.2129330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT The plurality and subjectivity of peace means that transitions from war are contested – i.e. permeated by conflicts between previously warring antagonists who want to (re)order postwar society according to competing peace(s). But while there always will exist mutually excluding peace(s), such outliers do not foreclose middle grounds where multiple peace(s) can coexist. In this article, I argue that the postwar city can generate coexistence between peace(s) of varying divergence through the creativity, accommodation, and fragmentation of city spaces. These arguments are illustrated through examples from postwar Belfast, Mitrovica, and Mostar. I term this conceptualization urban peace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
和平之间的和平?城市和平与城市空间中对立者的共存
和平的多元性和主观性意味着战争的过渡是有争议的——也就是说,以前交战的对手之间的冲突渗透着,他们希望根据竞争的和平(s)来(重新)秩序战后社会。但是,尽管总是存在相互排斥的和平,但这些异常值并不排除多种和平可以共存的中间地带。在这篇文章中,我认为战后城市可以通过城市空间的创造性、适应性和碎片化来产生不同分歧的和平共存。这些论点通过战后贝尔法斯特、米特罗维察和莫斯塔尔的例子加以说明。我把这个概念称为城市和平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding is a cross-disciplinary journal devoted to critical analysis of international intervention, focussing on interactions and practices that shape, influence and transform states and societies. In 21st century political practice, states and other actors increasingly strive to transplant what they see as normatively progressive political orders to other contexts. Accordingly, JISB focuses on the complex interconnections and mutually shaping interactions between donor and recipient communities within military, economic, social, or other interventional contexts, and welcomes perspectives on political life of, and beyond, European state-building processes. The journal brings together academics and practitioners from cross-disciplinary backgrounds, including international relations, political science, political economy, sociology, international law, social anthropology, geography, and regional studies. The editors are particularly interested in specific or comparative in-depth analyses of contemporary or historical interventions and state-building processes that are grounded in careful fieldwork and/or innovative methodologies. Multi or cross-disciplinary contributions and theoretically challenging pieces that broaden the study of intervention and state building to encompass processes of decision-making, or the complex interplay between actors on the ground, are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Correlates of Peace: Religious Determinants of Interreligious Peace Invoking ‘the Customary’ in the Formalization of Land Reform in Liberia and Sierra Leone Inclusivity in Practice: Patchworks of Inclusion at Multiple Tracks in the Colombian Peace Process Women, Peace and Security in EU Interventions: Analysing EULEX and Operation Irini Local Turn in Knowledge Production About Post-Conflict Societies: The Case of the Balkan Peace Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1