Problem-Based Learning in Professional Studies from the Physiotherapy Students’ Perspective

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning Pub Date : 2018-11-20 DOI:10.7771/1541-5015.1732
H. Korpi, Liisa Peltokallio, Arja Piirainen
{"title":"Problem-Based Learning in Professional Studies from the Physiotherapy Students’ Perspective","authors":"H. Korpi, Liisa Peltokallio, Arja Piirainen","doi":"10.7771/1541-5015.1732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to investigate how physiotherapy students using a problem-based learning approach develop into experts during higher education, and answers the question: How do physiotherapy students at bachelor’s level understand the problem-based learning approach while learning to become professionals? PBL is examined using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) of longitudinal data written by 15 voluntary students from two different higher education institutions and collected during 3.5 years. The main results on the new way of learning strengthen earlier conceptions of the importance of reflection in the learning process. The PBL method activates a reflection process by allowing students to participate in something that differs from their previous experiences of teaching and learning methods, which creates confusion and forces them to critically reflect on their actions. There are two dimensions of reflection in this study: self-reflection (information-seeking and creative learning processes) and reflection together (peer-group working and the teacher), in which reflection together seems to be more powerful than in earlier experiential learning theories. This study brings out the directions for and the timing of the necessary scaffolding and support for learning.","PeriodicalId":46380,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate how physiotherapy students using a problem-based learning approach develop into experts during higher education, and answers the question: How do physiotherapy students at bachelor’s level understand the problem-based learning approach while learning to become professionals? PBL is examined using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) of longitudinal data written by 15 voluntary students from two different higher education institutions and collected during 3.5 years. The main results on the new way of learning strengthen earlier conceptions of the importance of reflection in the learning process. The PBL method activates a reflection process by allowing students to participate in something that differs from their previous experiences of teaching and learning methods, which creates confusion and forces them to critically reflect on their actions. There are two dimensions of reflection in this study: self-reflection (information-seeking and creative learning processes) and reflection together (peer-group working and the teacher), in which reflection together seems to be more powerful than in earlier experiential learning theories. This study brings out the directions for and the timing of the necessary scaffolding and support for learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从物理治疗学生的角度看专业学习中的问题导向型学习
本研究的目的是调查使用问题为基础的学习方法的物理治疗学生如何在高等教育中发展成为专家,并回答这个问题:本科水平的物理治疗学生在学习成为专业人士的同时如何理解问题为基础的学习方法?本研究使用解释性现象学分析(IPA)对来自两所不同高等教育机构的15名志愿学生在3.5年的时间里撰写的纵向数据进行了检验。新学习方式的主要成果强化了早期关于反思在学习过程中的重要性的观念。PBL方法激活了一个反思过程,允许学生参与一些不同于他们以前的教学和学习方法的经验,这产生了混乱,迫使他们批判性地反思自己的行为。本研究中的反思有两个维度:自我反思(信息寻求和创造性学习过程)和共同反思(同伴小组工作和教师),其中共同反思似乎比早期的体验学习理论更强大。本研究提出了必要的脚手架和学习支持的方向和时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning
Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning (IJPBL) will be a global outlet for PBL scholarship, representing excellence in discovery and promoting transformative educational pedagogy. IJPBL will provide access to the most current research and practice related to PBL pedagogy, thus enhancing efforts of both PBL scholars and practitioners. The mission of IJPBL is to Publish rigorous research, representing a variety of disciplines, related to problem-based learning Engage key and emerging scholars in significant discussion of key issues facing PBL researchers and practitioners Provide up-to-date information to scholars and practitioners who are new to PBL research and pedagogy, enabling them to address current gaps in the literature and/or to transform current learning environments and practices.
期刊最新文献
Introduction to Special Issue “Research Methodologies for Studying Problem-based and Project-based Learning Problem-based Learning, a Tool to Develop Critical Thinking Skills of Undergraduate Veterinary Students Design and Implementation of a Problem-Based Learning Module in a Clinical Radiography Course to Foster Image Critique Skills: An Evaluative Case Study Networks Supporting Problem-Based Invention Education Impact of The NTN Design on Academic Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1