Was the 2019 Indian election won by digital media?

IF 1.8 Q2 COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION REVIEW Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10714421.2021.1933311
T. A. Neyazi, Ralph Schroeder
{"title":"Was the 2019 Indian election won by digital media?","authors":"T. A. Neyazi, Ralph Schroeder","doi":"10.1080/10714421.2021.1933311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research on the reasons for the unexpected outcome of the 2019 national election in India can be divided into two strands: one strand examines the election without recourse to media, arguing that the appeals by parties to different segments of the population, referred to as identity politics, swayed voters. The other strand has made the case that media campaigns, and digital media in particular, were decisive in shaping the electoral outcome. Among the explanations that focus on media, these can be further subdivided into those that make the case for traditional media still playing a more important role than online media, and others that argue that digital media, and perhaps even online disinformation, played a key role. In this paper, we analyze the evidence for these competing accounts, drawing on the available evidence. We argue that an explanation based on combining elements from both strands, plus the interaction between digital media and traditional media and offline mobilization, together explain Modi’s unanticipated election victory.","PeriodicalId":46140,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","volume":"24 1","pages":"87 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10714421.2021.1933311","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2021.1933311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on the reasons for the unexpected outcome of the 2019 national election in India can be divided into two strands: one strand examines the election without recourse to media, arguing that the appeals by parties to different segments of the population, referred to as identity politics, swayed voters. The other strand has made the case that media campaigns, and digital media in particular, were decisive in shaping the electoral outcome. Among the explanations that focus on media, these can be further subdivided into those that make the case for traditional media still playing a more important role than online media, and others that argue that digital media, and perhaps even online disinformation, played a key role. In this paper, we analyze the evidence for these competing accounts, drawing on the available evidence. We argue that an explanation based on combining elements from both strands, plus the interaction between digital media and traditional media and offline mobilization, together explain Modi’s unanticipated election victory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019年印度大选是由数字媒体赢得的吗?
对2019年印度大选意外结果原因的研究可以分为两股:一股是在不借助媒体的情况下考察选举,认为政党对不同人群的诉求(被称为身份政治)影响了选民。另一派则认为,媒体活动,尤其是数字媒体,在塑造选举结果方面起着决定性作用。在关注媒体的解释中,这些解释可以进一步细分为那些认为传统媒体仍然比在线媒体发挥更重要作用的解释,以及认为数字媒体,甚至可能是在线虚假信息发挥关键作用的解释。在本文中,我们利用现有的证据,分析了这些相互竞争的说法的证据。我们认为,结合两股因素的解释,加上数字媒体与传统媒体的互动以及线下动员,共同解释了莫迪出人意料的选举胜利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COMMUNICATION REVIEW
COMMUNICATION REVIEW COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The assimilated secret: Understanding as silence in Japanese LGBT discourse Skilling communication: The discourse and metadiscourse of communication in self-help books Young climate activists in television news: An analysis of multimodal constructions of voice, political recognition, and co-optation Contexts and dimensions of algorithm literacies: parents’ algorithm literacies amidst the datafication of parenthood How U.S.-based children’s news show CNN 10 reproduces neoliberal hegemony: A critical discourse analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1