{"title":"Two Communities’ Views on Test Fairness","authors":"D. Gitomer, Emi Iwatani","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2022.2087624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The education measurement community has centered the idea of test fairness in both theory and practice. Yet, racial justice advocates in education research and practice (the racial justice community) have consistently critiqued that assessments are hardly fair and play a critical and outsized role in contributing to racial and social inequities in the educational system and larger society. We attempt to unpack two communities’ different perspectives and different conclusions about fairness and assessments. We argue that these differences are rooted in the historical makeup of these communities, how they bound the issue of fairness, how they evaluate fairness, and how they consider the consequences of assessment both contemporaneously and historically. We conclude by contending that progress with respect to equity and justice will require an appreciation of and grappling with the nature of these differences and attention to boundaryspanners who have long identified with both communities.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"27 1","pages":"197 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2022.2087624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT The education measurement community has centered the idea of test fairness in both theory and practice. Yet, racial justice advocates in education research and practice (the racial justice community) have consistently critiqued that assessments are hardly fair and play a critical and outsized role in contributing to racial and social inequities in the educational system and larger society. We attempt to unpack two communities’ different perspectives and different conclusions about fairness and assessments. We argue that these differences are rooted in the historical makeup of these communities, how they bound the issue of fairness, how they evaluate fairness, and how they consider the consequences of assessment both contemporaneously and historically. We conclude by contending that progress with respect to equity and justice will require an appreciation of and grappling with the nature of these differences and attention to boundaryspanners who have long identified with both communities.
期刊介绍:
Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.