Remodelled, Rejected, Restored, Reinterpreted: The Many Incarnations of Kensington Palace

Q3 Arts and Humanities Court Historian Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14629712.2020.1728937
Joanna Tinworth
{"title":"Remodelled, Rejected, Restored, Reinterpreted: The Many Incarnations of Kensington Palace","authors":"Joanna Tinworth","doi":"10.1080/14629712.2020.1728937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"S ince the publication of Simon Thurley’s monograph on Hampton Court Palace in , there has been a need for a similar multi-disciplinary study of Kensington Palace. This book charts the architectural, court, cultural and social history of the building from its inception to the present day, going beyond the palace to include the history of the suburb of Kensington from medieval to modern times including detailed histories of the monarchs and courtiers who lived in or were associated with it. Usually treated as a side-note in the history of royal palaces, the authors seek to demonstrate that ‘Kensington holds an important place in the history of the modern monarchy’ (p. ), thereby rehabilitating a building which, since its construction over three centuries ago, has had more detractors than advocates. Howard Colvin called it ‘utilitarian and cheap’ (p. ) in comparison with Hampton Court Palace; to Queen Victoria it was ‘this poor old palace’ (p. ). Kensington Palace was built around a pre-existing Jacobean building between  and  and survived seventeenth-century disparagements of its lack of grandeur as ‘a patch’d building’ (p. ) to become the ‘hub of fashionable society’ by the s thanks largely to Queen Caroline (p. ). It was rejected as a primary royal residence by George III upon his accession in , after which it lay neglected and fell into disrepair until its piecemeal mending and partition to provide apartments for the royal family from c. . Despite this partition, and bomb damage during the Second World War, two phases of restoration around the turn of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries saw the palace become first the home of the London Museum and later a heritage attraction in its own right whilst remaining a home for members of the royal family. Co-authored by six curators from Historic Royal Palaces, the chapters are arranged broadly chronologically and grouped into five themes: ‘Kensington before the Palace’, ‘ARoyal Home’, ‘Georgian Kensington’, ‘The Aunt Heap’, and ‘Public Attraction and Private Home’. Part , ‘Kensington before the Palace’, provides the history and topography of the suburb of Kensington from medieval times to the seventeenth century, noting the importance of Kensington’s location ‘on the road that led directly to the palace of Whitehall, allowing a swift journey to the court and the city’. It goes on to describe the construction c. – for Sir George Coppin, probably by John Thorpe, of a house which would become the nucleus of Kensington Palace.","PeriodicalId":37034,"journal":{"name":"Court Historian","volume":"25 1","pages":"75 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14629712.2020.1728937","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court Historian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14629712.2020.1728937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

S ince the publication of Simon Thurley’s monograph on Hampton Court Palace in , there has been a need for a similar multi-disciplinary study of Kensington Palace. This book charts the architectural, court, cultural and social history of the building from its inception to the present day, going beyond the palace to include the history of the suburb of Kensington from medieval to modern times including detailed histories of the monarchs and courtiers who lived in or were associated with it. Usually treated as a side-note in the history of royal palaces, the authors seek to demonstrate that ‘Kensington holds an important place in the history of the modern monarchy’ (p. ), thereby rehabilitating a building which, since its construction over three centuries ago, has had more detractors than advocates. Howard Colvin called it ‘utilitarian and cheap’ (p. ) in comparison with Hampton Court Palace; to Queen Victoria it was ‘this poor old palace’ (p. ). Kensington Palace was built around a pre-existing Jacobean building between  and  and survived seventeenth-century disparagements of its lack of grandeur as ‘a patch’d building’ (p. ) to become the ‘hub of fashionable society’ by the s thanks largely to Queen Caroline (p. ). It was rejected as a primary royal residence by George III upon his accession in , after which it lay neglected and fell into disrepair until its piecemeal mending and partition to provide apartments for the royal family from c. . Despite this partition, and bomb damage during the Second World War, two phases of restoration around the turn of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries saw the palace become first the home of the London Museum and later a heritage attraction in its own right whilst remaining a home for members of the royal family. Co-authored by six curators from Historic Royal Palaces, the chapters are arranged broadly chronologically and grouped into five themes: ‘Kensington before the Palace’, ‘ARoyal Home’, ‘Georgian Kensington’, ‘The Aunt Heap’, and ‘Public Attraction and Private Home’. Part , ‘Kensington before the Palace’, provides the history and topography of the suburb of Kensington from medieval times to the seventeenth century, noting the importance of Kensington’s location ‘on the road that led directly to the palace of Whitehall, allowing a swift journey to the court and the city’. It goes on to describe the construction c. – for Sir George Coppin, probably by John Thorpe, of a house which would become the nucleus of Kensington Palace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改造,拒绝,修复,重新诠释:肯辛顿宫的诸多化身
自从西蒙·瑟利(Simon Thurley)关于汉普顿宫的专著在上发表以来,就有必要对肯辛顿宫进行类似的多学科研究。这本书描绘了这座建筑从建成到现在的建筑、宫廷、文化和社会历史,超越了宫殿,包括肯辛顿郊区从中世纪到现代的历史,包括居住在这里或与之相关的君主和朝臣的详细历史。通常被视为皇家宫殿历史上的一个旁注,作者试图证明“肯辛顿在现代君主制的历史上占有重要的地位”(p.),从而修复一座自三个多世纪前建造以来,批评者多于支持者的建筑。霍华德·科尔文(Howard Colvin)称它与汉普顿宫(Hampton Court Palace)相比“实用而廉价”(页);对维多利亚女王来说,它是“这座可怜的旧宫殿”(页)。肯辛顿宫是在和之间的一座原有的詹姆士王朝建筑周围建造的。17世纪,人们对肯辛顿宫的贬低是“一个拼凑的建筑”(p.),但肯辛顿宫幸存下来,并在年代成为“时尚社会的中心”,这在很大程度上要归功于卡罗琳女王(p.)。在年乔治三世登基后,它被拒绝作为皇室的主要住所,此后它被忽视,年久失修,直到c.开始被零星修补和分割,为皇室提供公寓。尽管在第二次世界大战期间遭到了分裂和炸弹的破坏,但在20世纪和21世纪交替的两个阶段的修复中,这座宫殿首先成为伦敦博物馆的所在地,后来成为一个遗产景点,同时仍然是皇室成员的家。由六位历史悠久的皇家宫殿策展人共同撰写,章节大致按时间顺序排列,分为五个主题:“宫殿之前的肯辛顿”,“皇家住宅”,“乔治亚肯辛顿”,“阿姨堆”和“公共景点和私人住宅”。部分,“宫殿之前的肯辛顿”,提供了从中世纪到17世纪肯辛顿郊区的历史和地形,注意到肯辛顿位置的重要性,“直接通往白厅宫的道路,允许快速前往宫廷和城市”。它接着描述了建造c.-的乔治·科普恩爵士,可能是由约翰·索普,这所房子将成为肯辛顿宫的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Court Historian
Court Historian Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
‘Una stalla bella e un Maestro eccellente’ In the Circle of Power: Friends of King Vladislav IV Vasa Early Modern Privacy at the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth Courts Ambassadors in Golden-Age Madrid Private Celebrations at the Polish Court in the Time of Louise Marie de Gonzague-Nevers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1