A modified NRCS-CN method for eliminating abrupt runoff changes induced by the categorical antecedent moisture conditions

Abstract

The popular Natural Resources Conservation Service Curve Number (NRCS-CN) (earlier known as Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method of rainfall-runoff modeling has often faced the criticism of exhibiting quantum jumps in runoff computations because of the sudden jumps appearing in CN-values derived from NEH-4 tables for three antecedent moisture conditions (AMC), viz., AMC-I, AMC-II, and AMC-III valid for dry, normal, and wet conditions, respectively. The variability of antecedent soil moisture within an AMC category is responsible for the abrupt jump and other deficiencies in the CN method for runoff estimation. This paper suggests a novel procedure to account for the antecedent moisture (M), preventing quantum jumps and eliminating deficiencies in determination of CN and, in turn, estimation of direct runoff. Its validity was verified utilizing the observed rainfall (P)-runoff (Q) events from 36 US watersheds, four sub-catchments of the Godavari basin, and small agricultural plots at Roorkee, India. The performance of the proposed model (M5) for runoff prediction was compared with the existing NRCS-CN (M1), Mishra and Singh (2002) (M2), Singh et al. (2015) (M3), and Verma et al. (2021) (M4) model using various performance indices. Using the CNs derived from observed events, model M5 was seen to have performed better than M1-M4 in terms of Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Percent Bias (PBIAS) for the data of US watersheds, and CN-P correlation improved as the coefficient of determination (R²) enhanced. Similarly, using the RS & GIS-based CNs on natural watersheds of the Godavari basin and considering AMC-I, the performance of M5 was again better than M1-M4 in terms of RMSE, Mean Bias Error (mBIAS), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Normalized-Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NNSE). Interestingly, there existed a significant (p < 0.05) relationship between the in-situ water content (w) measured for the experimental plots of Roorkee and the model input variable antecedent moisture (M), offering a physical touch to the conceptual model.