Adaptation Strategies of Opponents and Supporters of the Special Military Operation to the Current Situation (Based on Residents of Samara Region)

Q3 Social Sciences Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI:10.19181/socjour.2023.29.1.1
V. Zvonovsky, Alexander Khodykin
{"title":"Adaptation Strategies of Opponents and Supporters of the Special Military Operation to the Current Situation (Based on Residents of Samara Region)","authors":"V. Zvonovsky, Alexander Khodykin","doi":"10.19181/socjour.2023.29.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strategies for adapting to traumatic events such as military conflicts are largely determined by a person’s outlook on such events. As such, research on the differences in the adaptation strategies of Russian supporters and opponents of the “special military operation” in the Ukraine (SMO) to the current situation provides a sociological description of how assessments of traumatic events impact the development of strategies for adapting to them. The purpose of this article is to describe the similarities and differences in adaptation strategies between supporters and opponents of the SMO. To achieve the research goals, the authors conducted 4 focus group studies with 6 participants each from the Samara region in April of 2022, recruited by gender, age and income level. The adaptation strategies of supporters and opponents of the SMO have a number of similarities and differences. Both supporters and opponents reconsidered their everyday practices according to the changes in their conditions of living. Both parties look into the future with caution, while trying to distract themselves from their experiences by focusing on work and leisure, and avoiding discussing topics related to the Ukraine in order to prevent conflicts. At the same time, supporters of the SMO weren’t as worried about the difficulties associated with it, since for them they are mainly economic in nature, while opponents, in addition to economic issues, deal with psychological problems due to them disagreeing with the decision to send troops to the Ukraine. The adaptation strategy of supporters boils down to them solving their own everyday problems, believing in the best and trusting the official point of view on the SMO, removing themselves from political matters and leaving them to the powers that be. Its opponents found it much more difficult to adapt to the current situation. Their main adaptation strategy lies in avoiding the following: political news, discussing the SMO, as well as supporters of the SMO. They feel powerless to do anything about the situation, therefore, just like the supporters of the “special operation”, they try to delve into solving their own everyday problems, but they do it not with hope for a better future and faith in the capabilities of their country, but with a pessimistic rejection of the situation, a lack of any sort of positive outlook on the future, awareness of the unfairness of the situation and a sense of disagreement with it.","PeriodicalId":35261,"journal":{"name":"Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strategies for adapting to traumatic events such as military conflicts are largely determined by a person’s outlook on such events. As such, research on the differences in the adaptation strategies of Russian supporters and opponents of the “special military operation” in the Ukraine (SMO) to the current situation provides a sociological description of how assessments of traumatic events impact the development of strategies for adapting to them. The purpose of this article is to describe the similarities and differences in adaptation strategies between supporters and opponents of the SMO. To achieve the research goals, the authors conducted 4 focus group studies with 6 participants each from the Samara region in April of 2022, recruited by gender, age and income level. The adaptation strategies of supporters and opponents of the SMO have a number of similarities and differences. Both supporters and opponents reconsidered their everyday practices according to the changes in their conditions of living. Both parties look into the future with caution, while trying to distract themselves from their experiences by focusing on work and leisure, and avoiding discussing topics related to the Ukraine in order to prevent conflicts. At the same time, supporters of the SMO weren’t as worried about the difficulties associated with it, since for them they are mainly economic in nature, while opponents, in addition to economic issues, deal with psychological problems due to them disagreeing with the decision to send troops to the Ukraine. The adaptation strategy of supporters boils down to them solving their own everyday problems, believing in the best and trusting the official point of view on the SMO, removing themselves from political matters and leaving them to the powers that be. Its opponents found it much more difficult to adapt to the current situation. Their main adaptation strategy lies in avoiding the following: political news, discussing the SMO, as well as supporters of the SMO. They feel powerless to do anything about the situation, therefore, just like the supporters of the “special operation”, they try to delve into solving their own everyday problems, but they do it not with hope for a better future and faith in the capabilities of their country, but with a pessimistic rejection of the situation, a lack of any sort of positive outlook on the future, awareness of the unfairness of the situation and a sense of disagreement with it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特种军事行动反对者和支持者对当前形势的适应策略(基于萨马拉地区居民)
适应军事冲突等创伤性事件的策略在很大程度上取决于一个人对这些事件的看法。因此,研究俄罗斯对乌克兰“特殊军事行动”(SMO)的支持者和反对者对当前形势的适应策略差异,为创伤性事件的评估如何影响适应策略的发展提供了社会学描述。本文的目的是描述SMO的支持者和反对者在适应策略上的异同。为了实现研究目标,作者于2022年4月从萨马拉地区进行了4个焦点小组研究,每个小组有6名参与者,按性别、年龄和收入水平招募。SMO的支持者和反对者的适应策略有许多相似之处和不同点。支持者和反对者都根据生活条件的变化重新考虑他们的日常做法。双方都谨慎地展望未来,同时试图通过专注于工作和休闲来分散自己的注意力,并避免讨论与乌克兰有关的话题,以防止冲突。与此同时,SMO的支持者并不担心与之相关的困难,因为对他们来说,这主要是经济问题,而反对者除了经济问题外,还要处理心理问题,因为他们不同意向乌克兰派兵的决定。支持者的适应策略归结为他们解决自己的日常问题,相信最好的,相信官方对SMO的看法,把自己从政治事务中抽离出来,把它们交给当权者。它的反对者发现要适应目前的形势要困难得多。他们的主要适应策略在于避免以下内容:政治新闻、讨论SMO以及SMO的支持者。因此,他们感到对局势无能为力,就像“特别行动”的支持者一样,他们试图深入研究解决自己的日常问题,但他们这样做并不希望有一个更好的未来和对国家能力的信心,而是对局势的悲观拒绝,对未来缺乏任何积极的展望,意识到局势的不公平和不同意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal
Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: “Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal” publishes the articles on sociological disciplines. Interdisciplinary studies in sociology and related disciplines, such as social psychology, cultural studies, anthropology, ethnography, etc. — are also welcomed. The main emphasis is on the fundamental research in the field of theory, methodology and history of sociology. The regular rubric highlights the results of mass surveys and case studies. The rubric “Discussion”, which debated the controversial issues of sociological research, is regular as well. The journal publishes book reviews, and summaries, as well as lists of new books in Russian and English, which represent the main areas of interdisciplinary research in the social sciences. The journal aims to not only play samples of knowledge, considered regulatory and standards of internal expertise in the professional community, but also aims for opportunities to improve them. These rules, a tough selection and decision to print only a small portion of incoming materials allow “Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal” contribute to improving the quality of sociological research. Submitted manuscripts should show a high integrity in problem setting, problem analysis and correspond to the journal’s thematic profile and its scientific priorities.
期刊最新文献
Theoretical Approaches Towards Studying Motivation for Surrogate Motherhood A Person that Feels, Values, and Studies Time. Professor Garold E. Zborovsky is 85 Years Old Is it Possible for a Society to Exist Without Development? Telemedicine in Russian Megacities: Problems and Prospects Batygin’s Lesson stuck with me on my Professional Path — Always Check Yourself to Make Sure your Conclusions Can Be Substantiated”. Interview Prepared by D.M. Rogozin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1