Editorial: Innovative Practice

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice Pub Date : 2019-08-05 DOI:10.1177/1471301219868397
J. Moriarty
{"title":"Editorial: Innovative Practice","authors":"J. Moriarty","doi":"10.1177/1471301219868397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last decade, there has been increased recognition of the need and desirability of including people with dementia and their family carers and supporters as key stakeholders and active participants in all stages in the research process. Different models of involvement have developed, although it is widely accepted that progress has been uneven and that work still needs to be done (Bartlett, Hick, Houston, Gardiner, & Wallace, 2013; Charlesworth, 2018; Hayes, Costello, Nurock, Cornwall, & Francis, 2018). This issue of Innovative Practice takes three different accounts of involvement to highlight different examples of the importance of involving people with dementia and family carers in the full range of decisions, from technology aimed at improving people’s everyday lives to developing research protocols and programme implementation. The first article (Coetzer, 2019) is a case study of Mrs V (a pseudonym) who was referred for neuropsychiatric support after experiencing a stroke. She was particularly anxious about being unable to tell the time. Her family helped adapt a clock which indicated different time periods (morning, afternoon, evening, night) and meal times. The adapted clock was initially very effective but, as Mrs V’s cognitive abilities declined, its efficacy was reduced. Coetzer suggests that the clock example illustrates how tailored assistive technologies to which carers have contributed may result in better acceptance or ‘buy in’ and offer solutions where there are no existing technologies. At the same time, it needs to be recognised that carers will need support if the efficacy of any technologies to which they have contributed is reduced as the person’s condition progresses. The remaining contributions in this section (Giebel, Roe, Hodgson, Britt, & Clarkson, 2019; Swarbrick, Open Doors, EDUCATE, Davis, & Keady, 2019) draw on experiences from much larger scale studies. The second article by Swarbrick and colleagues (2019) describes the ‘CO-researcher INvolvement and Engagement in Dementia’ Model, or the COINED Model for short, which was co-produced with and alongside people living with dementia. The model was developed during the application stage of the Neighbourhoods","PeriodicalId":51413,"journal":{"name":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"3159 - 3160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1471301219868397","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301219868397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the last decade, there has been increased recognition of the need and desirability of including people with dementia and their family carers and supporters as key stakeholders and active participants in all stages in the research process. Different models of involvement have developed, although it is widely accepted that progress has been uneven and that work still needs to be done (Bartlett, Hick, Houston, Gardiner, & Wallace, 2013; Charlesworth, 2018; Hayes, Costello, Nurock, Cornwall, & Francis, 2018). This issue of Innovative Practice takes three different accounts of involvement to highlight different examples of the importance of involving people with dementia and family carers in the full range of decisions, from technology aimed at improving people’s everyday lives to developing research protocols and programme implementation. The first article (Coetzer, 2019) is a case study of Mrs V (a pseudonym) who was referred for neuropsychiatric support after experiencing a stroke. She was particularly anxious about being unable to tell the time. Her family helped adapt a clock which indicated different time periods (morning, afternoon, evening, night) and meal times. The adapted clock was initially very effective but, as Mrs V’s cognitive abilities declined, its efficacy was reduced. Coetzer suggests that the clock example illustrates how tailored assistive technologies to which carers have contributed may result in better acceptance or ‘buy in’ and offer solutions where there are no existing technologies. At the same time, it needs to be recognised that carers will need support if the efficacy of any technologies to which they have contributed is reduced as the person’s condition progresses. The remaining contributions in this section (Giebel, Roe, Hodgson, Britt, & Clarkson, 2019; Swarbrick, Open Doors, EDUCATE, Davis, & Keady, 2019) draw on experiences from much larger scale studies. The second article by Swarbrick and colleagues (2019) describes the ‘CO-researcher INvolvement and Engagement in Dementia’ Model, or the COINED Model for short, which was co-produced with and alongside people living with dementia. The model was developed during the application stage of the Neighbourhoods
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社论:创新实践
在过去十年中,人们越来越认识到需要和可取的是,将痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者和支持者作为研究过程各个阶段的关键利益攸关方和积极参与者。不同的参与模式已经发展起来,尽管人们普遍认为进展是不平衡的,仍然需要做一些工作(Bartlett, Hick, Houston, Gardiner, & Wallace, 2013;Charlesworth, 2018;Hayes, Costello, Nurock, Cornwall, & Francis, 2018)。本期《创新实践》采用了三种不同的参与方式,以突出不同的例子,说明让痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者参与从旨在改善人们日常生活的技术到制定研究方案和规划实施的各种决策的重要性。第一篇文章(Coetzer, 2019)是V夫人(化名)的案例研究,她在中风后被转诊接受神经精神支持。她特别担心看不清时间。她的家人帮助改装了一个时钟,可以显示不同的时间段(早上、下午、晚上、晚上)和用餐时间。调整后的时钟最初非常有效,但随着V夫人认知能力的下降,其效果也随之降低。Coetzer认为,时钟的例子说明了护理人员所贡献的量身定制的辅助技术如何能够更好地接受或“购买”,并在没有现有技术的情况下提供解决方案。与此同时,需要认识到,如果护理人员所使用的任何技术的效力随着患者病情的进展而降低,他们将需要支持。本节的其余贡献(Giebel, Roe, Hodgson, Britt, & Clarkson, 2019;Swarbrick, Open Doors, EDUCATE, Davis, & Keady, 2019)从更大规模的研究中吸取经验。斯瓦布里克及其同事(2019年)的第二篇文章描述了“共同研究人员参与和参与痴呆症”模型,简称“杜撰模型”,该模型是与痴呆症患者共同制作的。该模型是在社区应用阶段开发的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Dementia acts as a major forum for social research of direct relevance to improving the quality of life and quality of care for people with dementia and their families. For the first time an international research journal is available for academics and practitioners that has as its primary paradigm the lived experience of dementia.
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms in Emotional Information Processing in Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder: An Event-Related Potential Study of an Information Processing Model. Book Reviews: Diary of the Fall Doing relationship-centered dementia care: Learning from each other for better dementia support Book Review: Dementia Caregiving East and West: Issues of Communication Book Review: Book Reviews Williams 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1