Evaluation of Hysteroscopic Findings and Histopathologic Report of Endometrium in Postmenopausal Bleeding

M. Begum, S. Khatun, S. Begum, M. Amatullah, T. Mahmud, R. Ara, Mahmud-Un Nabi, F. Khatoon, T. Nazneen, J. Ferdous
{"title":"Evaluation of Hysteroscopic Findings and Histopathologic Report of Endometrium in Postmenopausal Bleeding","authors":"M. Begum, S. Khatun, S. Begum, M. Amatullah, T. Mahmud, R. Ara, Mahmud-Un Nabi, F. Khatoon, T. Nazneen, J. Ferdous","doi":"10.3329/bmrcb.v49i1.62797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Women with postmenopausal bleeding have 10%-15% chance of having endometrial carcinoma and therefore the diagnostic work is aimed at excluding uterine malignancy. For accurate diagnosis of cause of postmenopausal bleeding, endometrial abnormalities can be assessed by hysteroscopy and hysteroscopy directed biopsy or fractional curettage.\nObjective: To compare the hysteroscopic findings with histopathologic report of endometrium in postmenopausal bleeding.\nMethods: Cross sectional study was conducted in the department of gynaecological oncology in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University over 1 year from June 2019 to May 2020. Thirty women with the complaints of postmenopausal bleeding were enrolled.   Each women underwent hysteroscopic evaluation and endometrial tissue was obtained by hysteroscopy directed biopsy as well as fractional curettage in some cases, then sent for histopathology. Results were analyzed to find out sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of hysteroscopy, taking histopathological diagnosis as gold standard. Analysis was carried out by using SPSS version 26.\nResults: Hysteroscopic examination findings and histopathology of endometrium in 30 postmenopausal women, 11(36.6%) cases were found normal both on hysteroscopy and histopathology, among them 4(13.3%) cases were proliferative endometrium, 1(3.3%) was secretory endometrium and 5(16.6%) cases were found atrophic endometrium and 1(3.3%) tissue was insufficient. Hysteroscopic view of normal endometrium showed a sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 100% and accuracy 100%. For Endometrial polyp showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value   and accuracy 100%respectively. For Hyperplasia, hysteroscopy showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 96.2%, positive predictive value 80%, negative predictive value 100% and accuracy 96.7%. Endometrial carcinoma was found in 3(10%) cases and showed sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 96.3%, positive predictive value 75.0%, negative predictive value 100% and accuracy 96.7%. For the atrophic endometrium, sensitivity (100%), specificity (96.0%), positive predictive value (83.3%), negative predictive value (100%) and accuracy (96.7%). 1(3.3%) had in situ endometrial carcinoma and 2(6.6%) had adenomyosis on histopathology.\nConclusion: The study concludes that hysteroscopy and directed biopsy or fractional curettage is a highly accurate, sensitive, specific, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for diagnosis of cause of postmenopausal bleeding.\nBangladesh Medical Res Counc Bull 2023; 49(1): 1-14","PeriodicalId":8704,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v49i1.62797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women with postmenopausal bleeding have 10%-15% chance of having endometrial carcinoma and therefore the diagnostic work is aimed at excluding uterine malignancy. For accurate diagnosis of cause of postmenopausal bleeding, endometrial abnormalities can be assessed by hysteroscopy and hysteroscopy directed biopsy or fractional curettage. Objective: To compare the hysteroscopic findings with histopathologic report of endometrium in postmenopausal bleeding. Methods: Cross sectional study was conducted in the department of gynaecological oncology in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University over 1 year from June 2019 to May 2020. Thirty women with the complaints of postmenopausal bleeding were enrolled.   Each women underwent hysteroscopic evaluation and endometrial tissue was obtained by hysteroscopy directed biopsy as well as fractional curettage in some cases, then sent for histopathology. Results were analyzed to find out sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of hysteroscopy, taking histopathological diagnosis as gold standard. Analysis was carried out by using SPSS version 26. Results: Hysteroscopic examination findings and histopathology of endometrium in 30 postmenopausal women, 11(36.6%) cases were found normal both on hysteroscopy and histopathology, among them 4(13.3%) cases were proliferative endometrium, 1(3.3%) was secretory endometrium and 5(16.6%) cases were found atrophic endometrium and 1(3.3%) tissue was insufficient. Hysteroscopic view of normal endometrium showed a sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 100% and accuracy 100%. For Endometrial polyp showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value   and accuracy 100%respectively. For Hyperplasia, hysteroscopy showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 96.2%, positive predictive value 80%, negative predictive value 100% and accuracy 96.7%. Endometrial carcinoma was found in 3(10%) cases and showed sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 96.3%, positive predictive value 75.0%, negative predictive value 100% and accuracy 96.7%. For the atrophic endometrium, sensitivity (100%), specificity (96.0%), positive predictive value (83.3%), negative predictive value (100%) and accuracy (96.7%). 1(3.3%) had in situ endometrial carcinoma and 2(6.6%) had adenomyosis on histopathology. Conclusion: The study concludes that hysteroscopy and directed biopsy or fractional curettage is a highly accurate, sensitive, specific, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for diagnosis of cause of postmenopausal bleeding. Bangladesh Medical Res Counc Bull 2023; 49(1): 1-14
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫腔镜检查结果与子宫内膜组织病理学报告对绝经后出血的评价
背景:绝经后出血的妇女患子宫内膜癌的几率为10%-15%,因此诊断工作旨在排除子宫恶性肿瘤。为了准确诊断绝经后出血的原因,子宫内膜异常可以通过宫腔镜和宫腔镜引导的活检或刮除术进行评估。目的:比较绝经后出血子宫内膜的宫腔镜检查结果和组织病理学报告。方法:2019年6月至2020年5月,在Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学妇科肿瘤科进行了为期一年的横断面研究。30名女性因绝经后出血而被纳入研究。每个妇女都接受了宫腔镜检查,子宫内膜组织通过宫腔镜引导的活检以及部分刮除术(在某些情况下)获得,然后进行组织病理学检查。以组织病理学诊断为金标准,分析宫腔镜检查的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果:30例绝经后妇女宫腔镜检查结果及子宫内膜组织病理学检查,11例(36.6%)宫腔镜及组织病理学正常,其中增生性子宫内膜4例(13.3%),分泌性子宫内膜1例(3.3%),萎缩性子宫内膜5例(16.6%),组织不全1例(33%)。正常子宫内膜的宫腔镜检查显示敏感性100%,特异性100%,阳性预测值100%,阴性预测值100%和准确率100%。对子宫内膜息肉显示敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确率分别为100%。宫腔镜对增生症的敏感性为100%,特异性为96.2%,阳性预测值为80%,阴性预测值为100%,准确率为96.7%。发现子宫内膜癌3例(10%),敏感性为100%、特异性为96%、阳性预测值75.0%、阴性预测值100%,准确度为96.7%,特异性(96.0%)、阳性预测值(83.3%)、阴性预测值(100%)和准确性(96.7%)。1例(3.3%)为原位子宫内膜癌,2例(6.6%)为子宫腺肌病。结论:宫腔镜联合直接活检或刮除术对绝经后出血的诊断具有高度的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测价值和阴性预测价值。2023年孟加拉医学研究院;49(1):1-14
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The official publication of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Spinal Fusion in Degenerated Spinal Stenosis, proposing a hybrid scoring system for Bangladesh people in law Sack pain Preoperative Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as a predictor of malignant ovarian tumor Overview of Journals in Developing Countries Cell phone use and Self-reported wellbeing among teenage students of Bangladesh Association of Interleukin-10 Gene Polymorphism with Susceptibility and Severity of Axial Spondyloarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1