Approximate reciprocal relationship between two cause-specific hazard ratios in COVID-19 data with mutually exclusive events

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2021-04-27 DOI:10.1101/2021.04.22.21255955
Wentian Li, S. Cetin, A. Ulgen, M. Cetin, Hakan Şıvgın, Yaning Yang
{"title":"Approximate reciprocal relationship between two cause-specific hazard ratios in COVID-19 data with mutually exclusive events","authors":"Wentian Li, S. Cetin, A. Ulgen, M. Cetin, Hakan Şıvgın, Yaning Yang","doi":"10.1101/2021.04.22.21255955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract COVID-19 survival data presents a special situation where not only the time-to-event period is short, but also the two events or outcome types, death and release from hospital, are mutually exclusive, leading to two cause-specific hazard ratios (csHR d and csHR r ). The eventual mortality/release outcome is also analyzed by logistic regression to obtain odds-ratio (OR). We have the following three empirical observations: (1) The magnitude of OR is an upper limit of the csHR d : |log(OR)| ≥ |log(csHR d )|. This relationship between OR and HR might be understood from the definition of the two quantities; (2) csHR d and csHR r point in opposite directions: log(csHR d ) ⋅ log(csHR r ) < 0; This relation is a direct consequence of the nature of the two events; and (3) there is a tendency for a reciprocal relation between csHR d and csHR r : csHR d ∼ 1/csHR r . Though an approximate reciprocal trend between the two hazard ratios is in indication that the same factor causing faster death also lead to slow recovery by a similar mechanism, and vice versa, a quantitative relation between csHR d and csHR r in this context is not obvious. These results may help future analyses of data from COVID-19 or other similar diseases, in particular if the deceased patients are lacking, whereas surviving patients are abundant.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.22.21255955","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract COVID-19 survival data presents a special situation where not only the time-to-event period is short, but also the two events or outcome types, death and release from hospital, are mutually exclusive, leading to two cause-specific hazard ratios (csHR d and csHR r ). The eventual mortality/release outcome is also analyzed by logistic regression to obtain odds-ratio (OR). We have the following three empirical observations: (1) The magnitude of OR is an upper limit of the csHR d : |log(OR)| ≥ |log(csHR d )|. This relationship between OR and HR might be understood from the definition of the two quantities; (2) csHR d and csHR r point in opposite directions: log(csHR d ) ⋅ log(csHR r ) < 0; This relation is a direct consequence of the nature of the two events; and (3) there is a tendency for a reciprocal relation between csHR d and csHR r : csHR d ∼ 1/csHR r . Though an approximate reciprocal trend between the two hazard ratios is in indication that the same factor causing faster death also lead to slow recovery by a similar mechanism, and vice versa, a quantitative relation between csHR d and csHR r in this context is not obvious. These results may help future analyses of data from COVID-19 or other similar diseases, in particular if the deceased patients are lacking, whereas surviving patients are abundant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在具有互斥事件的COVID-19数据中,两个病因特异性风险比之间存在近似的倒数关系
摘要新冠肺炎生存数据呈现出一种特殊情况,即不仅事件发生时间短,而且死亡和出院这两种事件或结果类型相互排斥,导致两种原因特异性风险比(csHR d和csHR r)。最终的死亡率/释放结果也通过逻辑回归进行分析,以获得比值比(OR)。我们有以下三个经验观察结果:(1)OR的大小是csHR d:|log(OR)|≥|log(csHR d)|的上限。OR和HR之间的这种关系可以从这两个量的定义中理解;(2) csHR d和csHR r指向相反的方向:log(csHR d)-log(csHRr)<0;这种关系是这两个事件性质的直接结果;和(3)csHR d和csHR r之间存在一种相互关系的趋势:csHR d~1/csHR r。尽管两个危险比之间的近似倒数趋势表明,导致更快死亡的同一因素也会通过类似的机制导致缓慢恢复,反之亦然,但在这种情况下,csHR d和csHR r之间的定量关系并不明显。这些结果可能有助于未来分析新冠肺炎或其他类似疾病的数据,特别是如果死亡患者缺乏,而幸存患者充足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1