Meta-analysis of studies on eggshell concrete using mixed regression and response surface methodology

Beng Wei Chong , Rokiah Othman , Ramadhansyah Putra Jaya , Xiaofeng Li , Mohd Rosli Mohd Hasan , Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah
{"title":"Meta-analysis of studies on eggshell concrete using mixed regression and response surface methodology","authors":"Beng Wei Chong ,&nbsp;Rokiah Othman ,&nbsp;Ramadhansyah Putra Jaya ,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Li ,&nbsp;Mohd Rosli Mohd Hasan ,&nbsp;Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah","doi":"10.1016/j.jksues.2021.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Eggshell concrete is an innovative green material that helps to recycle eggshell waste while reducing the environmental harm caused by excessive cement production. However, recent studies on eggshell concrete are limited, and the outcomes may vary due to the variation of mix design. The design of the experiment is used to simplify and optimize the study of sustainable concrete, yet analysis involving eggshell concrete is still scarce. This paper aimed to develop mathematical models for the prediction of eggshell concrete compressive strength using mixed regression (MR) and response surface methodology (RSM). Overall, 43 datasets were collected from available studies in the literature on eggshell powder as partial cement replacement. The input variables used were the percentage of eggshell, percentage of Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag (GGBS), cement content, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, water, and Conplast SP-430 superplasticizer. The analysis of the contour plot concluded that eggshell powder increased the concrete compressive strength at an optimal replacement percentage between 5% and 10%. However, the partial cement replacement with eggshell powder is more optimal for mix design with higher water content. The statistical results of the model, such as R<sup>2</sup>, adjusted R<sup>2,</sup> and root-mean-square error (RMSE), indicated that both MR and RSM models are powerful tools to formulate and predict the eggshell concrete compressive strength. However, RSM models showed better accuracy and lower deviation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.03.011","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101836392100057X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Eggshell concrete is an innovative green material that helps to recycle eggshell waste while reducing the environmental harm caused by excessive cement production. However, recent studies on eggshell concrete are limited, and the outcomes may vary due to the variation of mix design. The design of the experiment is used to simplify and optimize the study of sustainable concrete, yet analysis involving eggshell concrete is still scarce. This paper aimed to develop mathematical models for the prediction of eggshell concrete compressive strength using mixed regression (MR) and response surface methodology (RSM). Overall, 43 datasets were collected from available studies in the literature on eggshell powder as partial cement replacement. The input variables used were the percentage of eggshell, percentage of Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag (GGBS), cement content, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, water, and Conplast SP-430 superplasticizer. The analysis of the contour plot concluded that eggshell powder increased the concrete compressive strength at an optimal replacement percentage between 5% and 10%. However, the partial cement replacement with eggshell powder is more optimal for mix design with higher water content. The statistical results of the model, such as R2, adjusted R2, and root-mean-square error (RMSE), indicated that both MR and RSM models are powerful tools to formulate and predict the eggshell concrete compressive strength. However, RSM models showed better accuracy and lower deviation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用混合回归和响应面方法对蛋壳混凝土研究的Meta分析
蛋壳混凝土是一种创新的绿色材料,有助于回收蛋壳废料,同时减少过量水泥生产对环境造成的危害。然而,目前对蛋壳混凝土的研究还很有限,而且由于配合比设计的不同,研究结果也会有所不同。实验设计用于简化和优化可持续混凝土的研究,但涉及蛋壳混凝土的分析仍然很少。本文旨在利用混合回归和响应面法建立预测蛋壳混凝土抗压强度的数学模型。总的来说,从现有的关于蛋壳粉作为部分水泥替代品的文献中收集了43个数据集。输入变量为蛋壳含量、矿渣粉(GGBS)含量、水泥含量、细骨料、粗骨料、水、conplasast SP-430高效减水剂。等高线图分析表明,蛋壳粉对混凝土抗压强度的提高,最佳替代率为5% ~ 10%。而对于高含水率的配合比设计,以蛋壳粉代替部分水泥更为理想。模型的R2、调整后的R2和均方根误差(RMSE)等统计结果表明,MR和RSM模型都是制定和预测蛋壳混凝土抗压强度的有力工具。RSM模型具有较好的精度和较低的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences
Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences (JKSUES) is a peer-reviewed journal published quarterly. It is hosted and published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. JKSUES is devoted to a wide range of sub-fields in the Engineering Sciences and JKSUES welcome articles of interdisciplinary nature.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mechanical sensorless control of a rotor-tied DFIG wind energy conversion system using a high gain observer Hydrogen production from microbial electrolysis cells powered with microbial fuel cells Robust decentralized plug and play voltage tracker of islanded microgrids under loads and lines uncertainties by the invariant ellipsoids The impact of the Tropical Water Project on the operation of Darbandikhan dam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1