Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?

Q4 Medicine Motricidade Pub Date : 2020-09-30 DOI:10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.18097
F. M. Lima, Diego Brenner, Gustavo de Mello Rodrigues, L. Fernandes, D. Bertoncello
{"title":"Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?","authors":"F. M. Lima, Diego Brenner, Gustavo de Mello Rodrigues, L. Fernandes, D. Bertoncello","doi":"10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.18097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to evaluate whether the 10-RM test can be applied to both trained and untrained people in elbow flexor strengthening exercises. The sample consisted of 23 men aged between 18 and 30 years old, of which 11 were untrained (NT - control group), and 12 were resistance-trained (TR - trained group). The experiment started with a specific warm-up session followed by collections of myoelectric signals from the brachial biceps muscle, bilaterally, in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contractions (MVIC), the 10-RM test for elbow flexion and the new MVIC, followed by deceleration. By analyzing each contraction separately contraction, a significant increase in RMS (Root Mean Square) was found by a normalized MVIC with regard to 1st contraction, starting from the 3rd repetition for the TR group. When comparing each contraction of the 10-RM test with the previous one, a significant reduction of MF (Median Frequency) between the 5th and the 6th repetition of the TR group was observed. It was concluded that the Test of 10 Maximum Repetitions should be reconsidered when performed for purposes of comparison between sides of the body. Also, when considering the probable fatigue caused by the successive movements, a better application of tests with 6 to 8 repetitions was suggested.","PeriodicalId":53589,"journal":{"name":"Motricidade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motricidade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.18097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate whether the 10-RM test can be applied to both trained and untrained people in elbow flexor strengthening exercises. The sample consisted of 23 men aged between 18 and 30 years old, of which 11 were untrained (NT - control group), and 12 were resistance-trained (TR - trained group). The experiment started with a specific warm-up session followed by collections of myoelectric signals from the brachial biceps muscle, bilaterally, in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contractions (MVIC), the 10-RM test for elbow flexion and the new MVIC, followed by deceleration. By analyzing each contraction separately contraction, a significant increase in RMS (Root Mean Square) was found by a normalized MVIC with regard to 1st contraction, starting from the 3rd repetition for the TR group. When comparing each contraction of the 10-RM test with the previous one, a significant reduction of MF (Median Frequency) between the 5th and the 6th repetition of the TR group was observed. It was concluded that the Test of 10 Maximum Repetitions should be reconsidered when performed for purposes of comparison between sides of the body. Also, when considering the probable fatigue caused by the successive movements, a better application of tests with 6 to 8 repetitions was suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
10-RM测试是否适合评估受过训练和未受过训练的个人?
目的是评估10-RM测试是否可以应用于训练和未训练的人在肘关节屈肌加强练习。样本由23名年龄在18 - 30岁之间的男性组成,其中11人未经训练(NT -对照组),12人接受阻力训练(TR -训练组)。实验从一个特定的热身阶段开始,然后收集来自肱二头肌的肌电信号,在最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)中,肘关节屈曲和新MVIC的10-RM测试,然后是减速。通过分别分析每次收缩,从第3次重复开始,TR组的标准化MVIC发现RMS(均方根)显著增加。当将每次10-RM测试的收缩与前一次进行比较时,观察到TR组在第5次和第6次重复之间的MF(中位频率)显著降低。结论是,当进行10次最大重复测试时,为了比较身体的两侧,应该重新考虑。此外,当考虑到连续运动可能引起的疲劳时,建议使用6至8次重复的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Motricidade
Motricidade Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physical activity levels and mental illness risk in elderly women during COVID-19: Physical activity and mental health of elderly The Expected Number of Olympic Medals: A Case Study of Team Portugal at Tokyo 2020 Dietary intake of young Portuguese handball players Strength training with blood flow restriction in HIV patients positive: a case study Reliability of the handheld dynamometer in the evaluation of the muscle strength of trunk extensors in healthy adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1