“Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t”: Perceived Discrimination and the Paradoxes of Assimilation among U.S. Muslims

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1177/07311214221114294
Kenneth R Vaughan, Jerry Z. Park, Joshua C. Tom, Murat Yilmaz
{"title":"“Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t”: Perceived Discrimination and the Paradoxes of Assimilation among U.S. Muslims","authors":"Kenneth R Vaughan, Jerry Z. Park, Joshua C. Tom, Murat Yilmaz","doi":"10.1177/07311214221114294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muslim Americans are a fast-growing minority group within the United States, both demographically and in the public consciousness. National surveys place them among the least liked groups in the U.S. cultural landscape, and throughout the twenty-first century they have often been the target of both high-profile vitriol and common daily abuses. We use logistic regression analyses of nationally representative data from the Pew Research Center’s 2011 Survey of American Muslims to better understand the social predictors of experiencing discrimination among American Muslims. Integrating these analyses with existing literature on minority group assimilation, we find that both patterns of assimilation and resistance to assimilation positively predict experiences of discrimination. These results suggest that American Muslims face no unequivocal path away from discriminatory experiences and inhabit a precarious place where assimilation presents more opportunities for exposure to discrimination and resistance to assimilation leads to sanctions from the dominant culture.","PeriodicalId":47781,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214221114294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Muslim Americans are a fast-growing minority group within the United States, both demographically and in the public consciousness. National surveys place them among the least liked groups in the U.S. cultural landscape, and throughout the twenty-first century they have often been the target of both high-profile vitriol and common daily abuses. We use logistic regression analyses of nationally representative data from the Pew Research Center’s 2011 Survey of American Muslims to better understand the social predictors of experiencing discrimination among American Muslims. Integrating these analyses with existing literature on minority group assimilation, we find that both patterns of assimilation and resistance to assimilation positively predict experiences of discrimination. These results suggest that American Muslims face no unequivocal path away from discriminatory experiences and inhabit a precarious place where assimilation presents more opportunities for exposure to discrimination and resistance to assimilation leads to sanctions from the dominant culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“你做就该死,你不做就该死”:美国穆斯林之间的感知歧视和同化悖论
穆斯林美国人在美国是一个快速增长的少数群体,无论是在人口统计上还是在公众意识中。全国性调查显示,他们是美国文化景观中最不受欢迎的群体之一,在整个21世纪,他们经常成为备受瞩目的尖酸刻薄和日常常见虐待的目标。我们对皮尤研究中心2011年美国穆斯林调查中具有全国代表性的数据进行了逻辑回归分析,以更好地了解美国穆斯林遭受歧视的社会预测因素。将这些分析与现有的少数群体同化文献相结合,我们发现同化模式和对同化的抵制都能积极预测歧视经历。这些结果表明,美国穆斯林没有明确的途径摆脱歧视性经历,他们生活在一个不稳定的地方,同化为他们提供了更多的机会,而对同化的抵制则导致了主流文化的制裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Established in 1957 and heralded as "always intriguing" by one critic, Sociological Perspectives is well edited and intensely peer-reviewed. Each issue of Sociological Perspectives offers 170 pages of pertinent and up-to-the-minute articles within the field of sociology. Articles typically address the ever-expanding body of knowledge about social processes and are related to economic, political, anthropological and historical issues.
期刊最新文献
Time as a Resource for Constructing Long-term Visions among Two Generations of Feminist Activism in Peru and Ecuador “What Else Explains This Trauma but Porn?” Women Partners of Porn Addicts as Claims-Makers “I Could Feel His Sadness and Disdain as He Told Me”: A Qualitative Analysis of Black Women’s Accounts of Vicarious Racism Schooled Families: Higher Education and Family Virtue The Structure of Social Capital and Cultural Participation: A Cross-sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1