Government Policy on Transport Options Directed towards the Advanced Age

J. Beaton, N. Kerse, Martin Connolly
{"title":"Government Policy on Transport Options Directed towards the Advanced Age","authors":"J. Beaton, N. Kerse, Martin Connolly","doi":"10.22158/sssr.v3n2p223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Response was noteworthy by both gender and cultural grouping New Zealand Maori and non-Maori to the question of transport options for older people.Method: Respondents were asked to rate government policy along a scale of very unhappy-to- very happy. These results were then analysed using ordinal logistic regression, Mann Whitney U test and descriptive analysis.Results: Participants totalled 931 with 421 New Zealand Maori and 510 New Zealand Maori non-Maori.New Zealand Maori: Within the three age categories (83-86, 87-89 & 90-93) it was New Zealand Maori males aged between 87-89 years followed by 83-86 years who indicated that they were predominantly happy or neither happy/unhappy with government policy. Males aged between 90-93 years were also very happy or had a marginal view of the legislation. For New Zealand Maori females instead a comparable number of those aged between 83-86 years view indicated that they either very happy to being neither happy or unhappy with the policy. Whereas for the next age grouping (87-89 years) their opinion reduced slightly to those who were either happy or neither happy/unhappy. A position similarly held by New Zealand Maori females aged 90 years plus.New Zealand non-Maori: Both New Zealand non-Maori male and female results demonstrated a similar pattern with them being mainly happy with the legislation, then neither happy or unhappy to being very happy. Conclusion: Generally it could be said that results from both New Zealand Maori and non-Maori were relatively impartial towards government transport legislation sitting either on the fence or just slightly above.","PeriodicalId":74882,"journal":{"name":"Studies in social science research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in social science research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/sssr.v3n2p223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Response was noteworthy by both gender and cultural grouping New Zealand Maori and non-Maori to the question of transport options for older people.Method: Respondents were asked to rate government policy along a scale of very unhappy-to- very happy. These results were then analysed using ordinal logistic regression, Mann Whitney U test and descriptive analysis.Results: Participants totalled 931 with 421 New Zealand Maori and 510 New Zealand Maori non-Maori.New Zealand Maori: Within the three age categories (83-86, 87-89 & 90-93) it was New Zealand Maori males aged between 87-89 years followed by 83-86 years who indicated that they were predominantly happy or neither happy/unhappy with government policy. Males aged between 90-93 years were also very happy or had a marginal view of the legislation. For New Zealand Maori females instead a comparable number of those aged between 83-86 years view indicated that they either very happy to being neither happy or unhappy with the policy. Whereas for the next age grouping (87-89 years) their opinion reduced slightly to those who were either happy or neither happy/unhappy. A position similarly held by New Zealand Maori females aged 90 years plus.New Zealand non-Maori: Both New Zealand non-Maori male and female results demonstrated a similar pattern with them being mainly happy with the legislation, then neither happy or unhappy to being very happy. Conclusion: Generally it could be said that results from both New Zealand Maori and non-Maori were relatively impartial towards government transport legislation sitting either on the fence or just slightly above.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府针对高龄人士的交通选择政策
背景:性别和文化组别新西兰毛利人和非毛利人对老年人的交通选择问题的反应值得注意。方法:调查对象被要求对政府的政策从“非常不满意”到“非常满意”进行打分。然后使用有序逻辑回归、Mann Whitney U检验和描述性分析对这些结果进行分析。结果:参与者共931人,其中421名新西兰毛利人和510名新西兰毛利人非毛利人。新西兰毛利人:在三个年龄段(83-86岁,87-89岁和90-93岁)中,新西兰毛利人男性的年龄在87-89岁之间,其次是83-86岁,他们表示对政府政策主要是满意或不满意/不满意。年龄在90-93岁之间的男性也非常高兴或对立法持边缘看法。相反,对于新西兰的毛利人女性,年龄在83-86岁之间的相当数量的人表示,他们要么对政策不满意,要么对政策不满意。然而,对于下一个年龄组(87-89岁),他们的看法略微减少到要么快乐,要么不快乐/不快乐。同样的职位由90岁以上的新西兰毛利妇女担任。新西兰非毛利人:新西兰非毛利人男性和女性的结果都显示出类似的模式,他们主要对立法感到满意,然后不满意或不满意到非常满意。结论:总的来说,可以说来自新西兰毛利人和非毛利人的结果对政府的交通立法是相对公正的,要么是中立的,要么是略高于中立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Field Research on Corruption in Private Enterprise -- Taking the "Criminal Law Amendment (12)" as an Opportunity The Relationship between Physical Exercise and Subjective Well-being: a Meta-Analysis based on The Chinese Student Population Application of Power Electronics Technology in Renewable Energy Systems Susan Glaspell’s “Trifles”: A Feminist/Post-Structuralist Reading Research on the Constitutional Reform of Kyrgyzstan and Its Influence on Political Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1