“The Regeneration of Society”: Thomas Ernest Hulme and the Early British Reception of Georges Sorel

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Modern Intellectual History Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.1017/s1479244322000543
T. Giordani, H. Mead
{"title":"“The Regeneration of Society”: Thomas Ernest Hulme and the Early British Reception of Georges Sorel","authors":"T. Giordani, H. Mead","doi":"10.1017/s1479244322000543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines T. E. Hulme's reading of Georges Sorel as a politically transversal thinker of moral renewal. It argues that, by distancing Sorel from syndicalism and by reading him as a thinker of moral absolutes, this interpretation constituted an act of resignification. This is shown by contrasting Hulme's reading with the dominant patterns of the British reception of Sorel. What emerges is the striking, and self-aware, originality of Hulme's positions. This originality, we argue, was made possible by the European scope of Hulme's intellectual horizon, which gave him the resources to read Sorel differently. Finally, we ask why Hulme read Sorel in this way. We suggest that Hulme was working through a contradiction between his relativistic philosophical education and an increasing need for political commitment. Sorel's ethics of commitment grounded in myth were a way to move from Bergsonian openness to a metaphysics capable of conceptualizing moral and political absolutes.","PeriodicalId":44584,"journal":{"name":"Modern Intellectual History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Intellectual History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479244322000543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines T. E. Hulme's reading of Georges Sorel as a politically transversal thinker of moral renewal. It argues that, by distancing Sorel from syndicalism and by reading him as a thinker of moral absolutes, this interpretation constituted an act of resignification. This is shown by contrasting Hulme's reading with the dominant patterns of the British reception of Sorel. What emerges is the striking, and self-aware, originality of Hulme's positions. This originality, we argue, was made possible by the European scope of Hulme's intellectual horizon, which gave him the resources to read Sorel differently. Finally, we ask why Hulme read Sorel in this way. We suggest that Hulme was working through a contradiction between his relativistic philosophical education and an increasing need for political commitment. Sorel's ethics of commitment grounded in myth were a way to move from Bergsonian openness to a metaphysics capable of conceptualizing moral and political absolutes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“社会的再生”:托马斯·欧内斯特·休姆与英国早期对乔治·索雷尔的接受
本文考察了赫尔姆将索雷尔解读为政治上的道德复兴的横向思想家。它认为,通过将索雷尔与工团主义拉开距离,并将他视为道德绝对的思想家,这种解释构成了一种辞职行为。这可以通过对比休姆的阅读和英国接受索雷尔的主要模式来证明。赫尔姆的观点具有鲜明的、自知的独创性。我们认为,这种独创性是由于休姆知识视野的欧洲范围而成为可能的,这给了他以不同方式阅读索雷尔的资源。最后,我们问赫尔姆为什么这样读索莱尔。我们认为,休姆是在他的相对论哲学教育和日益增长的政治承诺需求之间的矛盾中工作的。索雷尔以神话为基础的承诺伦理是一种从柏格森式的开放转向能够概念化道德和政治绝对的形而上学的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Structuralist or Lesbian? Claude Lévi-Strauss and Monique Wittig on Rousseau's “Science” From the Hebrew Commonwealth to Party Politics: Rousseau's Legacy and the Nation-State in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought From the Body of the King to the Body of the Nation: Sovereignty, Sodomy, and the English Revolution of 1688 Escaping the Global Event: Pan-Islam and the First World War Foucault, Post-structuralism, and the Fixed “Openness of History”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1