Durable supports for refugees in higher education through resisting short-termism and organisational memory loss: illustrative cases from Australia and Germany

IF 2.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management Pub Date : 2022-09-29 DOI:10.1080/1360080X.2022.2129316
J. Berg, M. Grüttner, S. Baker
{"title":"Durable supports for refugees in higher education through resisting short-termism and organisational memory loss: illustrative cases from Australia and Germany","authors":"J. Berg, M. Grüttner, S. Baker","doi":"10.1080/1360080X.2022.2129316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recently, an increasing number of students from refugee and asylum-seeking backgrounds (SRABs) entering universities in settlement countries such as Australia and Germany have necessitated the establishment of a variety of supports, both as formal programs and informal ad-hoc networks. However, to date, little attention has been paid to the organisational conditions surrounding such supports. This study thus examined these conditions through the conceptual lens of organisational memory loss. Based on the two illustrative cases of Australia and Germany, it was described how building durable and responsive supports for SRABs is undermined by structural, ideological, and temporal imperatives that erode the possibilities for a sharable organisational memory. Furthermore, it was argued that similar to global arguments for durable pathways to settlement, universities need to develop and deliver lasting expertise and durable student supports by focusing on preserving organisational memory.","PeriodicalId":51489,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management","volume":"45 1","pages":"36 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2129316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recently, an increasing number of students from refugee and asylum-seeking backgrounds (SRABs) entering universities in settlement countries such as Australia and Germany have necessitated the establishment of a variety of supports, both as formal programs and informal ad-hoc networks. However, to date, little attention has been paid to the organisational conditions surrounding such supports. This study thus examined these conditions through the conceptual lens of organisational memory loss. Based on the two illustrative cases of Australia and Germany, it was described how building durable and responsive supports for SRABs is undermined by structural, ideological, and temporal imperatives that erode the possibilities for a sharable organisational memory. Furthermore, it was argued that similar to global arguments for durable pathways to settlement, universities need to develop and deliver lasting expertise and durable student supports by focusing on preserving organisational memory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过抵制短期主义和组织记忆丧失,在高等教育中为难民提供持久支持:来自澳大利亚和德国的例证
摘要最近,越来越多来自难民和寻求庇护背景的学生进入澳大利亚和德国等定居国家的大学,这就需要建立各种支持,包括正式项目和非正式的临时网络。然而,到目前为止,人们很少关注围绕此类支持的组织条件。因此,这项研究通过组织记忆丧失的概念视角来检验这些情况。根据澳大利亚和德国的两个说明性案例,描述了为SRAB建立持久和响应性支持是如何被结构性、意识形态和时间紧迫性所破坏的,这些紧迫性侵蚀了共享组织记忆的可能性。此外,有人认为,与全球关于持久解决途径的争论类似,大学需要通过专注于保存组织记忆来发展和提供持久的专业知识和持久的学生支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management is an international journal of professional experience and ideas in post-secondary education. It is a must read for those seeking to influence educational policy making. The journal also aims to be of use to managers and senior academic staff who seek to place their work and interests in a broad context and influence educational policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the notion of feminine leadership in Kuwait’s private universities Using self-determination theory as a lens to create sustainable futures for teaching and education focused academics in higher education in Australia What makes a Thesis by Publication? An international study of policy requirements and restrictions Growth mindsets in academics and academia: a review of influence and interventions Academic excellence initiatives: global perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1