Compound worlds and metaphor landscapes: Affixoids, allostructions, and higher-order generalizations

IF 0.7 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Word Structure Pub Date : 2019-10-30 DOI:10.3366/word.2019.0151
S. Hartmann
{"title":"Compound worlds and metaphor landscapes: Affixoids, allostructions, and higher-order generalizations","authors":"S. Hartmann","doi":"10.3366/word.2019.0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the use of German -landschaft ‘landscape’ and -welt ‘world’ as compound constituents. Both occur frequently in metaphorical uses such as Korpuslandschaft ‘corpus landscape’ or Arbeitswelt ‘labor world’. The high productivity of both compound types raises the question of whether [N-landschaft] and [N-welt] form constructions in their own right, both with a collectivizing meaning, and if so, how they relate to their respective higher-order schemas. More specifically, the question arises how the metaphorical-collectivizing uses relate to non-metaphorical ones. As both metaphorical and non-metaphorical reading variants coexist, these patterns show interesting similarities to those semantically bleached compound constituents that have been discussed under the label of “affixoids” in the morphological literature and in recent constructionist approaches. Drawing on synchronic data from the DWDS reference corpus of the 20th century and from the webcorpus DECOW16B as well as diachronic data from the German Text Archive, I argue that they form part of a family of collectivizing constructions. On a more theoretical note, I discuss how the higher-order generalizations connecting this family of constructions can be conceptualized.","PeriodicalId":43166,"journal":{"name":"Word Structure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Word Structure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2019.0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of German -landschaft ‘landscape’ and -welt ‘world’ as compound constituents. Both occur frequently in metaphorical uses such as Korpuslandschaft ‘corpus landscape’ or Arbeitswelt ‘labor world’. The high productivity of both compound types raises the question of whether [N-landschaft] and [N-welt] form constructions in their own right, both with a collectivizing meaning, and if so, how they relate to their respective higher-order schemas. More specifically, the question arises how the metaphorical-collectivizing uses relate to non-metaphorical ones. As both metaphorical and non-metaphorical reading variants coexist, these patterns show interesting similarities to those semantically bleached compound constituents that have been discussed under the label of “affixoids” in the morphological literature and in recent constructionist approaches. Drawing on synchronic data from the DWDS reference corpus of the 20th century and from the webcorpus DECOW16B as well as diachronic data from the German Text Archive, I argue that they form part of a family of collectivizing constructions. On a more theoretical note, I discuss how the higher-order generalizations connecting this family of constructions can be conceptualized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复合世界和隐喻景观:词缀、构形和高阶概括
本文研究了德国“景观”和世界“世界”作为复合成分的使用。两者都经常出现在隐喻用法中,如Korpuslandschaft的“语料库景观”或Arbeitswert的“劳动世界”。这两种复合类型的高生产率提出了一个问题,即[N-landschaft]和[N-whit]是否以其自身的权利形成了具有集体化意义的结构,如果是,它们如何与各自的高阶图式联系。更具体地说,出现了一个问题,即隐喻性的集体化使用与非隐喻性使用之间的关系。由于隐喻和非隐喻阅读变体共存,这些模式与形态学文献和最近的建构主义方法中以“词缀”标签讨论的那些语义漂白的复合成分显示出有趣的相似性。根据20世纪DWDS参考语料库和网络语料库DECOW16B的共时数据,以及德国文本档案馆的历时数据,我认为它们是集体化结构家族的一部分。在一个更具理论意义的方面,我讨论了如何将连接这一构造族的高阶推广概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Word Structure
Word Structure LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Studying negative evidence in Finnish language corpora The structuralist tradition meets empirical data: Corpus data enhancing the Czech Internet Language Reference Book Uncertainty in the production of Czech noun and verb forms Realised overabundance in Estonian noun paradigms: A corpus study Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1