Pension insurance contributions and corporate financialization: evidence from China

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT Nankai Business Review International Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI:10.1108/nbri-04-2022-0045
Changyuan Xia, Xie Mao, Haizong Yu, Kam C. Chan
{"title":"Pension insurance contributions and corporate financialization: evidence from China","authors":"Changyuan Xia, Xie Mao, Haizong Yu, Kam C. Chan","doi":"10.1108/nbri-04-2022-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate the impact of a firm’s pension insurance contributions (PIC) on its financialization (investment in risky assets) using a sample of Chinese firms.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors use a multiple regression model to conduct the analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings suggest that a firm’s PIC increases its financialization. Additional analysis suggests that firms with higher PIC are more likely to have lower operating profit and higher financial risk. In addition, the impact of PIC on financialization is more salient when a firm faces high industry competitiveness, holds more cash, has high labor costs and labor intensity or is non-state owned.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe paper adds to the growing literature on the effect of social insurance on corporate policies. The findings complement those related to the relationship between defined contributions and defined benefits retirement plans and corporate policies.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe study contributes to the debate on the merits of financialization. The literature is mixed on the pros and cons of financialization. The results suggest that financialization has an adverse effect on a firm’s performance and risk in the lens of increased PIC.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nChina has seen a trend of financialization arising from the rapid economic development in the past decade. Moreover, the PIC premiums in China are not trivial. Thus, the significant cost of PIC and the financialization trend suggest that the answer to the research question is timely and meaningful.\n","PeriodicalId":44958,"journal":{"name":"Nankai Business Review International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nankai Business Review International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nbri-04-2022-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the impact of a firm’s pension insurance contributions (PIC) on its financialization (investment in risky assets) using a sample of Chinese firms. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a multiple regression model to conduct the analysis. Findings The findings suggest that a firm’s PIC increases its financialization. Additional analysis suggests that firms with higher PIC are more likely to have lower operating profit and higher financial risk. In addition, the impact of PIC on financialization is more salient when a firm faces high industry competitiveness, holds more cash, has high labor costs and labor intensity or is non-state owned. Practical implications The paper adds to the growing literature on the effect of social insurance on corporate policies. The findings complement those related to the relationship between defined contributions and defined benefits retirement plans and corporate policies. Social implications The study contributes to the debate on the merits of financialization. The literature is mixed on the pros and cons of financialization. The results suggest that financialization has an adverse effect on a firm’s performance and risk in the lens of increased PIC. Originality/value China has seen a trend of financialization arising from the rapid economic development in the past decade. Moreover, the PIC premiums in China are not trivial. Thus, the significant cost of PIC and the financialization trend suggest that the answer to the research question is timely and meaningful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养老保险缴费与企业金融化:来自中国的证据
本文旨在以中国企业为样本,研究企业养老保险缴费对其金融化(风险资产投资)的影响。设计/方法/方法作者使用多元回归模型进行分析。研究结果表明,公司的PIC提高了其金融化程度。进一步的分析表明,PIC越高的公司,其营业利润越低,财务风险也越高。此外,当企业面临较高的行业竞争力、持有较多现金、劳动力成本和劳动强度较高或非国有企业时,PIC对金融化的影响更为显著。实践意义本文对社会保险对公司政策影响的文献进行了补充。这些发现补充了有关固定缴款和固定福利退休计划与公司政策之间关系的研究结果。社会意义该研究有助于对金融化优点的辩论。文献对金融化的利弊看法不一。结果表明,在PIC增加的情况下,金融化对公司的绩效和风险有不利影响。在过去的十年里,中国经济的快速发展产生了一种金融化的趋势。此外,中国的私人保险保费并非微不足道。因此,知情同意的显著成本和金融化趋势表明,研究问题的答案是及时和有意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Nankai Business Review International (NBRI) provides insights in to the adaptation of American and European management theory in China, the differences and exchanges between Chinese and western management styles, the relationship between Chinese enterprises’ management practice and social evolution and showcases the development and evolution of management theories based on Chinese cultural characteristics. The journal provides research of interest to managers and entrepreneurs worldwide with an interest in China as well as research associations and scholars focusing on Chinese problems in business and management.
期刊最新文献
Research on business model innovation of SMEs in the industrial internet era: building theory from the case of PAYA Delegation and salary information disclosure strategies of customer acquisition and retention Enhancing word of mouth in the quick service restaurants: role of perceived brand globalness and localness Can stakeholders’ attention to innovation promote corporate innovation? The effect of referral tasks on customers’ referral likelihood on social platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1