Reflection in I-O psychology: Herding sheep

Abstract

Modelling a process of reflection and reflexivity, Hyland (2023) has demonstrated a means by which I-O psychology can better produce innovative solutions for complex, multicausal, adaptive problems. Reflection and reflexivity call for identification of biases, assumptions, evaluation of Outcome, and adjustment of action. We agree that philosophy of science provides a systematic framework and that the challenge to consider what future we envision is timely. Nearly 50 years ago, Kerr ’ s (1975) now classic article pointed out the folly of rewarding A while hoping for B. If, as a discipline and profession, we are to realize the potential of I-O psychology to address complex human issues then perhaps this is the time to do something other than more of A. We agree that reflection and reflexivity are fit for that purpose and need to be embedded in curricula. As edu-cators and practitioners, our experience is that it not only can be incorporated into academic and professional preparation, but that doing so pays dividends. A common theme in the literature on critical reflection and reflexivity is uncovering assumptions: both those upon which we act but of which we are unaware and assumptions to which we subscribe but have not critically examined and simply accepted as some “ given