Unfair labour practice on staff in primary health care facilities, North West province, South Africa: A qualitative study

Q2 Medicine Curationis Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI:10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2171
M. Serapelwane, E. Manyedi
{"title":"Unfair labour practice on staff in primary health care facilities, North West province, South Africa: A qualitative study","authors":"M. Serapelwane, E. Manyedi","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Unfair labour practices on staff is a worldwide concern which creates conflicts and disharmony among health workers in the workplace. It is found that, nursing staff members are unfairly treated without valid reasons in primary health care (PHC) facilities and predominantly in the developing countries and South Africa is not an exception. Objectives The purpose of the study was to explore and describe the experiences of operational managers regarding unfair labour practices on staff by their local health area managers, and describe the perceptions of operational managers towards such treatment. Method A qualitative, descriptive, exploratory and contextual research approach was considered appropriate for the study. The population of the study comprised operational managers working in PHC facilities in the North West province, South Africa. Purposive sampling was used to select participants for the study and focus group interviews used to interview 23 operational managers. Ethical measures were applied throughout the study. Results The six phases of thematic analysis were used to analyse the data collected for the study. Two themes that emerged are experiences of factors related to unfair labour practices in the PHC facilities and the perceptions regarding how to improve their working conditions. The categories that were found in the first themes were favouritism and discrimination. In the second theme, in-service training and transparency regarding staff training and development emerged. Recommendations comprised, among others, training on the concepts of equality in the workplace, and reinforcement of transparency regarding granting of study leave and attending workshops. Conclusion Operational managers in the PHC facilities experienced unfair labour practices as evidenced by favouritism and discrimination.","PeriodicalId":35715,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Unfair labour practices on staff is a worldwide concern which creates conflicts and disharmony among health workers in the workplace. It is found that, nursing staff members are unfairly treated without valid reasons in primary health care (PHC) facilities and predominantly in the developing countries and South Africa is not an exception. Objectives The purpose of the study was to explore and describe the experiences of operational managers regarding unfair labour practices on staff by their local health area managers, and describe the perceptions of operational managers towards such treatment. Method A qualitative, descriptive, exploratory and contextual research approach was considered appropriate for the study. The population of the study comprised operational managers working in PHC facilities in the North West province, South Africa. Purposive sampling was used to select participants for the study and focus group interviews used to interview 23 operational managers. Ethical measures were applied throughout the study. Results The six phases of thematic analysis were used to analyse the data collected for the study. Two themes that emerged are experiences of factors related to unfair labour practices in the PHC facilities and the perceptions regarding how to improve their working conditions. The categories that were found in the first themes were favouritism and discrimination. In the second theme, in-service training and transparency regarding staff training and development emerged. Recommendations comprised, among others, training on the concepts of equality in the workplace, and reinforcement of transparency regarding granting of study leave and attending workshops. Conclusion Operational managers in the PHC facilities experienced unfair labour practices as evidenced by favouritism and discrimination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非西北省初级卫生保健机构工作人员的不公平劳动做法:一项定性研究
背景员工的不公平劳动行为是全世界关注的问题,它会在工作场所的卫生工作者之间造成冲突和不和谐。研究发现,在初级卫生保健设施中,护理人员在没有正当理由的情况下受到不公平待遇,主要发生在发展中国家,南非也不例外。目的本研究的目的是探讨和描述运营经理对当地卫生部门经理对员工的不公平劳动做法的经历,并描述运营经理对此待遇的看法。方法采用定性、描述性、探索性和情境研究相结合的方法进行研究。研究对象包括在南非西北省PHC设施工作的运营经理。采用目的性抽样法选择研究参与者,并采用焦点小组访谈法访谈23名运营经理。在整个研究过程中采用了伦理措施。结果采用六个阶段的专题分析法对本研究收集的数据进行分析。出现的两个主题是与初级保健设施中的不公平劳动做法有关的因素的经验,以及对如何改善其工作条件的看法。在第一个主题中发现的类别是偏袒和歧视。在第二个主题中,出现了在职培训以及工作人员培训和发展方面的透明度。除其他外,建议包括对工作场所平等概念进行培训,以及加强给予学习假和参加讲习班的透明度。结论PHC设施的运营管理人员经历了不公平的劳动行为,偏袒和歧视就是明证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curationis
Curationis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identity work of public hospital nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa Midwifery hurdles: Navigating tuberculosis screening challenges in South Africa Newly qualified professional nurses' experiences providing postoperative care to children in CTICU. Nurses' practices in stroke-related dysphagia in low- and middle-income countries. Guidelines to support newly qualified professional nurses for effective clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1