Ideology's Absent Shadow: A Conversation about Rhetoric

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION Rhetoric & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2021-08-24 DOI:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0069
Johnson, Mckerrow
{"title":"Ideology's Absent Shadow: A Conversation about Rhetoric","authors":"Johnson, Mckerrow","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We have been asked to engage in a conversation about the current role of ideology—as critique, as rhetoric, as a framework within which academics operate. Our approach will not seek to write the history of rhetorical critique from an ideological perspective, nor work from extant literature as one might in a traditional research essay. Still, we reference ideas emanating from that literature; instead of the normal \"source citation in text,\" we will list references at the end. Our ideas do not exist in a vacuum—they are stimulated by our own reading/writing in the area of ideology critique—from the original \"ideological turn\" to the present day. Hence it seems appropriate to acknowledge where ideas, especially about missing elements or future trajectories in research, come from. This conversation touches on the Cold War afterlife of the public as an ideological force, whiteness's role in gatekeeping the field, and how political liberalism and those interpellated by it constrain the field's future(s).","PeriodicalId":45013,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","volume":"24 1","pages":"69 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:We have been asked to engage in a conversation about the current role of ideology—as critique, as rhetoric, as a framework within which academics operate. Our approach will not seek to write the history of rhetorical critique from an ideological perspective, nor work from extant literature as one might in a traditional research essay. Still, we reference ideas emanating from that literature; instead of the normal "source citation in text," we will list references at the end. Our ideas do not exist in a vacuum—they are stimulated by our own reading/writing in the area of ideology critique—from the original "ideological turn" to the present day. Hence it seems appropriate to acknowledge where ideas, especially about missing elements or future trajectories in research, come from. This conversation touches on the Cold War afterlife of the public as an ideological force, whiteness's role in gatekeeping the field, and how political liberalism and those interpellated by it constrain the field's future(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意识形态的缺席阴影:关于修辞学的对话
摘要:我们被要求参与一场关于意识形态当前作用的对话——作为批判,作为修辞,作为学术运作的框架。我们的方法不会寻求从意识形态的角度来写修辞批评的历史,也不会像在传统的研究文章中那样从现存的文献中进行研究。尽管如此,我们还是参考了那些文献中的思想;我们将在末尾列出参考文献,而不是通常的“文本中的源引文”。从最初的“意识形态转向”到今天,我们的思想并不存在于真空中——它们是由我们自己在意识形态批判领域的阅读/写作所激发的。因此,承认想法的来源,尤其是关于研究中缺失的元素或未来轨迹的想法,似乎是合适的。这场对话涉及公众作为意识形态力量的冷战后的生活,白人在这一领域的把关作用,以及政治自由主义及其煽动者如何约束这一领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Rhetoric & Public Affairs COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Satire as the Comic Public Sphere: Postmodern "Truthiness" and Civic Engagement by James E. Caron (review) Designing "The People": Constitutive Fractures in Contemporary Collectives Replacing Notorious: Barret, Ginsburg, and Postfeminist Positioning Informing a Nation: The Newspaper Presidency of Thomas Jefferson by Mel Laracey (review) Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates by Catherine Chaput (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1