{"title":"Comparison of Single Centrifugation, Double Centrifugation and Turn down-Turn up Techniques for Platelet-Rich Plasma Quality","authors":"E. A. Maharani, Dewi Astuti","doi":"10.15850/amj.v9n3.2628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a new concept used in medical world, especially for wound healing. The main process that affects the PRP quality is the centrifugation process. This study aimed to assess the PRP separation process and determine the best technique of various centrifugation process.Methods: This experimental study used acid citrate dextrose (ACD) blood taken from 11 healthy respondents and compared three-techniques including the single centrifugation (SC), the double centrifugation (DC), and the double centrifugation turn down - turn up (DC-TDTU) techniques. The quality of PRP was measured based on blood cells count (platelet, leukocyte, erythrocyte count, and Ht value) at each stage of centrifugation. The examination was carried out in 2021 at the Hematology Laboratory, Poltekkes Jakarta 3.Results: The mean values of platelets, leukocytes, and Ht were increased in PRP compared to plasma supernatant both using the DC and DC-TDTU techniques, wherase the SC technique decreased in plasma compared with whole blood. When the procedures using DC and DC-TDTU are carried out properly, platelets would be concentrated in the second centrifugation. However, some erythrocyte and leukocyte contamination occurred by DC-TDTU technique compared to the DC technique.Conclusion: The double centrifugation technique is the best Platelet-rich plasma separation technique compared to the DC-TDTU and SC techniques.","PeriodicalId":31310,"journal":{"name":"Althea Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Althea Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15850/amj.v9n3.2628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a new concept used in medical world, especially for wound healing. The main process that affects the PRP quality is the centrifugation process. This study aimed to assess the PRP separation process and determine the best technique of various centrifugation process.Methods: This experimental study used acid citrate dextrose (ACD) blood taken from 11 healthy respondents and compared three-techniques including the single centrifugation (SC), the double centrifugation (DC), and the double centrifugation turn down - turn up (DC-TDTU) techniques. The quality of PRP was measured based on blood cells count (platelet, leukocyte, erythrocyte count, and Ht value) at each stage of centrifugation. The examination was carried out in 2021 at the Hematology Laboratory, Poltekkes Jakarta 3.Results: The mean values of platelets, leukocytes, and Ht were increased in PRP compared to plasma supernatant both using the DC and DC-TDTU techniques, wherase the SC technique decreased in plasma compared with whole blood. When the procedures using DC and DC-TDTU are carried out properly, platelets would be concentrated in the second centrifugation. However, some erythrocyte and leukocyte contamination occurred by DC-TDTU technique compared to the DC technique.Conclusion: The double centrifugation technique is the best Platelet-rich plasma separation technique compared to the DC-TDTU and SC techniques.
背景:富含血小板的血浆(PRP)是医学界使用的一个新概念,尤其是用于伤口愈合。影响PRP质量的主要过程是离心过程。本研究旨在评估PRP分离过程,并确定各种离心过程的最佳技术。方法:本实验采用11名健康受试者的酸性柠檬酸-葡萄糖(ACD)血液,比较了单次离心(SC)、双次离心(DC)和双次离心下翻(DC-TDTU)三种技术。基于离心每个阶段的血细胞计数(血小板、白细胞、红细胞计数和Ht值)来测量PRP的质量。该检查于2021年在Poltekkes Jakarta 3的血液学实验室进行。结果:与使用DC和DC-TDTU技术的血浆上清液相比,PRP中血小板、白细胞和Ht的平均值增加,而血浆中SC技术的平均值与全血相比降低。当使用DC和DC-TDTU的程序正确进行时,血小板将在第二次离心中浓缩。然而,与DC技术相比,DC-TDTU技术发生了一些红细胞和白细胞污染。结论:与DC-TDTU和SC技术相比,双离心技术是最好的富血小板血浆分离技术。