Level of Knowledge Management among Faculty Members in the Context of Nepali Higher Educational Institution

K. Paudel
{"title":"Level of Knowledge Management among Faculty Members in the Context of Nepali Higher Educational Institution","authors":"K. Paudel","doi":"10.3126/DSAJ.V14I0.27370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge management is taken as an integral component of any institution to enhance organizational effectiveness and productivity. Knowledge Management (KM) in academia is being prioritized these days to enhance academic activities and discourses. The knowledge management impacts to enhance the academic activities in academia, particularly for higher educational institutions (HEIs). Furthermore, the practices of KM enhance academic activities in higher educational institutions. Thus, the purpose of this research was to measure the level of KM among faculty members of HEIs. The quantitative method was used to conduct this research. The tools to measure knowledge management practices among faculty members of HEIs were developed by using Delphi methods. The 445 respondents were taken from the four universities of Nepal. Similarly, the data was taken from these universities as well. The factor analysis was used to identify the dimension of KM. The factor analysis identified seven dimensions of KM; knowledge utilization, acquisition, generation, dissemination, transfer, creation, and presentation. To analyze the level of the knowledge management, mean and standard deviation were used as the indicators or analysis tools for this research. The level of knowledge management was categorized into three groups viz. low, medium, and high. The study found that the overall pace of KM was high except for the knowledge generation process in the context of higher education. Due to individual differences and the organizational environment, culture, and technological infrastructure, it makes the level of knowledge generation differences comparing from other dimensions of knowledge management.","PeriodicalId":30105,"journal":{"name":"Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/DSAJ.V14I0.27370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Knowledge management is taken as an integral component of any institution to enhance organizational effectiveness and productivity. Knowledge Management (KM) in academia is being prioritized these days to enhance academic activities and discourses. The knowledge management impacts to enhance the academic activities in academia, particularly for higher educational institutions (HEIs). Furthermore, the practices of KM enhance academic activities in higher educational institutions. Thus, the purpose of this research was to measure the level of KM among faculty members of HEIs. The quantitative method was used to conduct this research. The tools to measure knowledge management practices among faculty members of HEIs were developed by using Delphi methods. The 445 respondents were taken from the four universities of Nepal. Similarly, the data was taken from these universities as well. The factor analysis was used to identify the dimension of KM. The factor analysis identified seven dimensions of KM; knowledge utilization, acquisition, generation, dissemination, transfer, creation, and presentation. To analyze the level of the knowledge management, mean and standard deviation were used as the indicators or analysis tools for this research. The level of knowledge management was categorized into three groups viz. low, medium, and high. The study found that the overall pace of KM was high except for the knowledge generation process in the context of higher education. Due to individual differences and the organizational environment, culture, and technological infrastructure, it makes the level of knowledge generation differences comparing from other dimensions of knowledge management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔高等院校教师的知识管理水平
知识管理被视为任何机构的一个组成部分,以提高组织的有效性和生产力。如今,学术界的知识管理(KM)正被优先考虑,以加强学术活动和学术话语。知识管理有助于加强学术界的学术活动,特别是对高等教育机构(HEI)。此外,知识管理的实践促进了高等教育机构的学术活动。因此,本研究的目的是测量高等院校教员的知识管理水平。本研究采用定量方法。利用德尔菲方法开发了衡量高等学校教师知识管理实践的工具。445名受访者来自尼泊尔的四所大学。同样,数据也取自这些大学。因子分析用于确定知识管理的维度。因子分析确定了知识管理的七个维度;知识的利用、获取、生成、传播、转移、创造和呈现。为了分析知识管理水平,本研究采用均值和标准差作为指标或分析工具。知识管理水平分为三组,即低、中、高。研究发现,除了高等教育背景下的知识生成过程外,知识管理的总体速度很高。由于个体差异以及组织环境、文化和技术基础设施的影响,与知识管理的其他维度相比,知识生成水平存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Payment and Motivation: Female Community Health Volunteers in Nepal Sampling and Trustworthiness Issues in Qualitative Research Interview with Professor Dilli Ram Dahal Ecological Implications of Local Curriculum: Lessons Learned from a Participatory Action Research Project in a School in Nepal Indigenous Rodhi Culture of Gurung and Factors of its Transform at Ghandruk Kaski in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1