Towards better working conditions for persons performing services through digital labour platforms

C. Cauffman
{"title":"Towards better working conditions for persons performing services through digital labour platforms","authors":"C. Cauffman","doi":"10.1177/1023263x221085234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online platforms created new ways for people to make a living. Not only did they make it easier for small producers and resellers to fi nd potential clients via online marketplaces; they also created online markets for the provision of services. The example that usually comes to mind when thinking of this latter type of online platforms is Uber, but there is an enormous number of such platforms, and they are active in very different fi elds: passenger transport, food delivery, trans-lation, programming, proofreading, web design, etc. About 500 labour platforms appear to be active in the EU. These generally present themselves as mere intermediaries, offering a place where supply and demand for services can meet. They also stress the freedom of the service provider to organize its own work, to work when, where and as many hours as desired. In their view, this implies that the persons providing services via their platform are self-employed and not employees. Several studies indicated that 9 out 10 platforms classify their workers as self-employed. Another study found that most of these workers ‘ are genuinely autonomous in their work and can use platform work as a way to develop their entrepreneurial activities ’","PeriodicalId":39672,"journal":{"name":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"3 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x221085234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online platforms created new ways for people to make a living. Not only did they make it easier for small producers and resellers to fi nd potential clients via online marketplaces; they also created online markets for the provision of services. The example that usually comes to mind when thinking of this latter type of online platforms is Uber, but there is an enormous number of such platforms, and they are active in very different fi elds: passenger transport, food delivery, trans-lation, programming, proofreading, web design, etc. About 500 labour platforms appear to be active in the EU. These generally present themselves as mere intermediaries, offering a place where supply and demand for services can meet. They also stress the freedom of the service provider to organize its own work, to work when, where and as many hours as desired. In their view, this implies that the persons providing services via their platform are self-employed and not employees. Several studies indicated that 9 out 10 platforms classify their workers as self-employed. Another study found that most of these workers ‘ are genuinely autonomous in their work and can use platform work as a way to develop their entrepreneurial activities ’
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为通过数字劳工平台提供服务的人员创造更好的工作条件
在线平台为人们创造了新的谋生方式。它们不仅使小型生产商和经销商更容易通过在线市场找到潜在客户;他们还创建了提供服务的在线市场。当想到后一类在线平台时,通常会想到的例子是优步,但这类平台数量巨大,它们活跃在非常不同的领域:客运、送餐、翻译、编程、校对、网页设计等。大约有500个劳动力平台在欧盟活跃。这些机构通常只是中介机构,提供一个可以满足服务供需的地方。他们还强调服务提供商可以自由组织自己的工作,在何时何地工作,并根据需要工作多少小时。在他们看来,这意味着通过其平台提供服务的人是自营职业者,而不是雇员。几项研究表明,十分之九的平台将其员工归类为自营职业者。另一项研究发现,这些员工中的大多数“在工作中真正具有自主性,可以利用平台工作来发展他们的创业活动”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Non-contractual liability of the EU: Need for a ‘diligent’ administrator test The European Arrest Warrant and the protection of the best interests of the child: The Court's last word on the limits of mutual recognition and the evolving obligations of national judicial authorities OP v. Commune d’Ans: When equality, intersectionality and state neutrality collide DPA independence and ‘indirect’ access – illusory in Belgium, France and Germany? Chilling effect: Turning the poison into an antidote for fundamental rights in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1