The Subalternization of a Progressive Legal Project: The Rights of Nature in Ecuador

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Mexican Law Review Pub Date : 2017-12-14 DOI:10.22201/IIJ.24485306E.2018.20.11895
Laura Nieto Sanabria
{"title":"The Subalternization of a Progressive Legal Project: The Rights of Nature in Ecuador","authors":"Laura Nieto Sanabria","doi":"10.22201/IIJ.24485306E.2018.20.11895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this note, the author uses the categories of subalternity and hegemony, proposed by Antonio Gramsci, in order to analyze the political process that emerged with the proclamation of the Rights of Nature in the Constitution of Montecristi, the new Constitution of Ecuador that came into existence in 2008. Out of the understanding that every legislative process arises from a political project within a historical bloc with specific interactions between forces, the Alianza Pais political project has searched for new ways of approaching the human-nature relationship through the “Revolucion Ciudadana” in order to avoid the exploitation and commercialization of nature. Nonetheless, the Rights of Nature initiative has received much criticism from many fields: 1) the false distinction between nature and humanity; 2) the change from an obligation to take care of nature to rights of nature as a neoliberal danger; 3) the supposed liberation of nature within liberal market thinking. For that matter, the Rights of Nature can be understood as a political project that has been subalternized by the hegemonic political project within ecological thinking that goes hand-inhand with neoliberal politics, the so-called Green Economy. This hegemonic project in the ecological field is working towards the continuance of the exploitation and commercialization of nature and has become more powerful than the Rights of Nature initiative by using it to give entrance to green neoliberal projects in Ecuador.","PeriodicalId":41684,"journal":{"name":"Mexican Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mexican Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIJ.24485306E.2018.20.11895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this note, the author uses the categories of subalternity and hegemony, proposed by Antonio Gramsci, in order to analyze the political process that emerged with the proclamation of the Rights of Nature in the Constitution of Montecristi, the new Constitution of Ecuador that came into existence in 2008. Out of the understanding that every legislative process arises from a political project within a historical bloc with specific interactions between forces, the Alianza Pais political project has searched for new ways of approaching the human-nature relationship through the “Revolucion Ciudadana” in order to avoid the exploitation and commercialization of nature. Nonetheless, the Rights of Nature initiative has received much criticism from many fields: 1) the false distinction between nature and humanity; 2) the change from an obligation to take care of nature to rights of nature as a neoliberal danger; 3) the supposed liberation of nature within liberal market thinking. For that matter, the Rights of Nature can be understood as a political project that has been subalternized by the hegemonic political project within ecological thinking that goes hand-inhand with neoliberal politics, the so-called Green Economy. This hegemonic project in the ecological field is working towards the continuance of the exploitation and commercialization of nature and has become more powerful than the Rights of Nature initiative by using it to give entrance to green neoliberal projects in Ecuador.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进步法律计划的次择化:厄瓜多尔的自然权利
在本说明中,作者使用了安东尼奥·葛兰西提出的从属和霸权类别,以分析随着《蒙特克里斯托宪法》(2008年生效的厄瓜多尔新宪法)中自然权利的宣布而出现的政治进程。出于对每一个立法过程都源于一个历史集团内的政治项目的理解,Alianza Pais的政治项目通过“城市革命”寻求处理人性关系的新途径,以避免自然的剥削和商业化。尽管如此,自然权利倡议还是受到了许多领域的批评:1)自然与人类之间的错误区分;2) 从照顾自然的义务转变为作为新自由主义危险的自然权利;3) 自由市场思想中所谓的自然解放。就这一点而言,自然权利可以被理解为一个政治项目,它被生态思维中的霸权政治项目所取代,该项目与新自由主义政治密切相关,即所谓的绿色经济。这一生态领域的霸权项目正致力于继续开发和商业化自然,并通过利用自然权利倡议为厄瓜多尔的绿色新自由主义项目提供入口,变得比自然权利倡议更强大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards an evidence-based pretrial risk assessment in Mexican juvenile offenders: A systematic review of relevant instruments using COSMIN guidelines review of the legal tax framework for digital platforms in Mexico Mexican State’s interpretation of indigenous self-determination in the age of democracy (1992-2022) influence of feminist mobilization on legal consciousness and the practices of femicide prosecutors in Mexico at the subnational level characteristics of Russian and Mexican environmental taxation systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1