Assessment of pruritus in atopic dermatitis: validation of the Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS)

G. Yosipovitch, E. Simpson, A. Bushmakin, J. Cappelleri, T. Luger, S. Ständer, W. Tom, K. Benjamin, W. Ports, A. Tallman, H. Tan, R. Gerber
{"title":"Assessment of pruritus in atopic dermatitis: validation of the Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS)","authors":"G. Yosipovitch, E. Simpson, A. Bushmakin, J. Cappelleri, T. Luger, S. Ständer, W. Tom, K. Benjamin, W. Ports, A. Tallman, H. Tan, R. Gerber","doi":"10.1097/itx.0000000000000013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pruritus, or itch, is a central feature of atopic dermatitis (AD) and is often cited as the most bothersome symptom. The Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS) is a 4-point rating scale adapted from the Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index to provide a measure of pruritus severity within a 24-hour recall period. The objective of this analysis was to assess the qualitative and quantitative validity of the SPS in AD. Methods: Content validity of the SPS was evaluated qualitatively in US patients with AD. Psychometric properties of the SPS were evaluated using data from 2 phase 3 trials conducted to investigate crisaborole in mild to moderate AD (study AD-301: NCT02118766; study AD-302: NCT02118792). Results: Fourteen patients were included in the qualitative analysis, considered adequate because of the single-item, single-concept nature of the SPS. Itch was the most prevalent symptom, and the SPS was easily understood and completed in US English (n=9) and US Spanish (n=5). The psychometric analysis used data from 1344 patients. Test-retest reliability analysis identified an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.54 for a single SPS observation, and at least 0.70 when at least 2 SPS observations were averaged. SPS scores correlated with Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA) scores, measures of quality of life, and 4 of 5 signs of AD (Pearson correlations, ≥0.40 at day 29). The difference in score between the no disease group/clear (ISGA 0) and the severe disease group (ISGA 4) was 0.80. The clinically important difference was estimated to be 0.20 and the clinically important response was estimated to be at least a 0.19-point reduction from baseline. Discussion: The SPS is an appropriate tool to assess itch in patients with AD and is a valid and reliable measure of pruritus severity.","PeriodicalId":73523,"journal":{"name":"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"3 1","pages":"e13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/itx.0000000000000013","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/itx.0000000000000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction: Pruritus, or itch, is a central feature of atopic dermatitis (AD) and is often cited as the most bothersome symptom. The Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS) is a 4-point rating scale adapted from the Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index to provide a measure of pruritus severity within a 24-hour recall period. The objective of this analysis was to assess the qualitative and quantitative validity of the SPS in AD. Methods: Content validity of the SPS was evaluated qualitatively in US patients with AD. Psychometric properties of the SPS were evaluated using data from 2 phase 3 trials conducted to investigate crisaborole in mild to moderate AD (study AD-301: NCT02118766; study AD-302: NCT02118792). Results: Fourteen patients were included in the qualitative analysis, considered adequate because of the single-item, single-concept nature of the SPS. Itch was the most prevalent symptom, and the SPS was easily understood and completed in US English (n=9) and US Spanish (n=5). The psychometric analysis used data from 1344 patients. Test-retest reliability analysis identified an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.54 for a single SPS observation, and at least 0.70 when at least 2 SPS observations were averaged. SPS scores correlated with Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA) scores, measures of quality of life, and 4 of 5 signs of AD (Pearson correlations, ≥0.40 at day 29). The difference in score between the no disease group/clear (ISGA 0) and the severe disease group (ISGA 4) was 0.80. The clinically important difference was estimated to be 0.20 and the clinically important response was estimated to be at least a 0.19-point reduction from baseline. Discussion: The SPS is an appropriate tool to assess itch in patients with AD and is a valid and reliable measure of pruritus severity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特应性皮炎瘙痒的评估:瘙痒严重程度量表(SPS)的验证
简介:瘙痒是特应性皮炎(AD)的主要特征,也是最令人烦恼的症状。瘙痒严重程度量表(SPS)是一个4分的评分量表,改编自特应性皮炎严重程度指数,以提供24小时回忆期内瘙痒严重程度的测量。本分析的目的是评估SPS在AD中的定性和定量有效性。方法:对美国AD患者的SPS内容效度进行定性评价。SPS的心理测量特性评估使用了两项研究crisaborole治疗轻中度AD的3期试验的数据(研究AD-301: NCT02118766;研究AD-302: NCT02118792)。结果:14例患者被纳入定性分析,由于SPS的单项目、单概念性质,被认为是足够的。瘙痒是最常见的症状,美国英语(n=9)和美国西班牙语(n=5)的SPS易于理解和完成。心理测量分析使用了来自1344名患者的数据。重测信度分析表明,单次SPS观测的类内相关系数为0.54,至少2次SPS观测的类内相关系数为0.70。SPS评分与研究者静态全局评估(ISGA)评分、生活质量测量和AD 5个体征中的4个相关(Pearson相关性,第29天≥0.40)。无病/清组(ISGA 0)与重病组(ISGA 4)的评分差异为0.80。临床重要差异估计为0.20,临床重要反应估计至少比基线降低0.19点。讨论:SPS是一种评估AD患者瘙痒的合适工具,也是一种有效可靠的瘙痒严重程度测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real-world clinical efficacy of nemolizumab in Japanese patients with atopic dermatitis Kappa opioid agonists in the treatment of itch: just scratching the surface? Oral administration of 4′-demethyl nobiletin inhibits dry skin-induced mechanical alloknesis The effect of repetitive topical applications of local anesthetics (EMLA) on experimental pain and itch (histaminergic and nonhistaminergic) Potential antipruritic neuronal targets of nalfurafine in the murine spinal dorsal horn
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1