Challenges of Clinical Education in Midwifery and Strategies to Improve It: A Qualitative Study

A. Shayan, Faegheh Golalizadeh Bibalan, Mahya Shafaei, M. Rahnavardi, S. Masoumi
{"title":"Challenges of Clinical Education in Midwifery and Strategies to Improve It: A Qualitative Study","authors":"A. Shayan, Faegheh Golalizadeh Bibalan, Mahya Shafaei, M. Rahnavardi, S. Masoumi","doi":"10.5812/ERMS.88228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recognizing the barriers to clinical training and providing appropriate solutions to them significantly enhance the quality of clinical training. Objectives: The present study was conducted to evaluate the challenges of midwifery clinical training, and propose solutions from the perspective of midwifery instructors and students. Methods: The present qualitative study was conducted on 10 midwifery instructors and 10 midwifery students using semi-structured interviews (n = 12) and focus groups (n = 8). Each interview or focus group lasted 45 - 90 minutes. The interviews and codes extracted were stored in Max QD. Content analysis was also used to analyze the qualitative data. Results: Analyzing the data led to the extraction of two main themes, i.e. efficient clinical training and strategic planning challenges, four categories, i.e. efficient clinical instructors, quality of clinical setting, learners’ perception of the situation and efficient educational planning, eight subcategories, i.e. instructors’ clinical competence, instructors’ motivation, professional attitude, humiliating experiences, restricted resources, inappropriate atmosphere of the clinical setting, inefficient curriculum and inefficient educational methods, and twenty semantic units. Conclusions: Clinical training can be improved by considering the job motivation of the midwifery instructors, reviewing the system of selecting and evaluating the instructors, paying attention to the psychological dimension and academic motivation of the students, enhancing the intra-organizational cooperation in line with training, optimally allocating educational resources, reviewing the educational curricula based on the community needs and developing midwifery references tailored to professional goals.","PeriodicalId":32200,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ERMS.88228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Recognizing the barriers to clinical training and providing appropriate solutions to them significantly enhance the quality of clinical training. Objectives: The present study was conducted to evaluate the challenges of midwifery clinical training, and propose solutions from the perspective of midwifery instructors and students. Methods: The present qualitative study was conducted on 10 midwifery instructors and 10 midwifery students using semi-structured interviews (n = 12) and focus groups (n = 8). Each interview or focus group lasted 45 - 90 minutes. The interviews and codes extracted were stored in Max QD. Content analysis was also used to analyze the qualitative data. Results: Analyzing the data led to the extraction of two main themes, i.e. efficient clinical training and strategic planning challenges, four categories, i.e. efficient clinical instructors, quality of clinical setting, learners’ perception of the situation and efficient educational planning, eight subcategories, i.e. instructors’ clinical competence, instructors’ motivation, professional attitude, humiliating experiences, restricted resources, inappropriate atmosphere of the clinical setting, inefficient curriculum and inefficient educational methods, and twenty semantic units. Conclusions: Clinical training can be improved by considering the job motivation of the midwifery instructors, reviewing the system of selecting and evaluating the instructors, paying attention to the psychological dimension and academic motivation of the students, enhancing the intra-organizational cooperation in line with training, optimally allocating educational resources, reviewing the educational curricula based on the community needs and developing midwifery references tailored to professional goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产临床教育面临的挑战及改进策略:定性研究
背景:认识到临床培训的障碍并为其提供适当的解决方案,可以显著提高临床培训的质量。目的:本研究旨在评估助产临床培训的挑战,并从助产教师和学生的角度提出解决方案。方法:本研究采用半结构化访谈(n=12)和焦点小组(n=8)对10名助产师和10名助产学生进行了定性研究。每个访谈或焦点小组持续45-90分钟。提取的访谈和代码存储在Max QD中。内容分析也被用来分析定性数据。结果:通过对数据的分析,提取了两个主题,即有效的临床培训和战略规划挑战,四个类别,即高效的临床讲师、临床环境质量、学习者对情况的感知和高效的教育规划,八个子类别,即讲师的临床能力、讲师的动机,专业态度、羞辱经历、资源受限、临床环境氛围不合适、课程效率低下和教育方法效率低下,以及二十个语义单元。结论:临床培训可以通过考虑助产士教员的工作动机,审查教员的选拔和评估制度,关注学生的心理维度和学术动机,加强与培训相一致的组织内合作,优化教育资源配置,根据社区需求审查教育课程,并根据专业目标制定助产参考资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Roles of Family Functioning and Cognitive Failure in Predicting High-risk Behaviors Among Students with a History of Learning Disability The State of Moral Intelligence of Medical Students of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences in 2022 Creativity Accreditation Has Potential to Motivate Students with Low Grades to Improve Their Results: A Letter to Editor Identifying and Ranking Critical Success Factors for Cloud Computing Deployment at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinical Education: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1