What we talk about when we talk about digital Holocaust memory: A systematic analysis of research published in academic journals, 2010–2022

IF 1.8 Q2 COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.1080/10714421.2023.2177489
Noam Tirosh, Roni Mikel-Arieli
{"title":"What we talk about when we talk about digital Holocaust memory: A systematic analysis of research published in academic journals, 2010–2022","authors":"Noam Tirosh, Roni Mikel-Arieli","doi":"10.1080/10714421.2023.2177489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent years, digital technologies have presented new opportunities for innovative Holocaust commemoration and education. Accordingly, scholars across disciplines have focused on “digital Holocaust memory” as a new frontier in both research and practice. But what exactly do they mean when they use this term? This article provides a systematic analysis of the literature regarding digital Holocaust memory as published in leading academic journals between 2010 and 2022. We position the digitalization of Holocaust memory within the context of the global evolution of memory culture and differentiate between the Holocaust’s “master narrative” and alternative, more peripheral Holocaust-related themes and perspectives. Scholars perceive the digitalization of Holocaust memory as enabling a new focus on marginal Holocaust-related narratives, but we demonstrate that they nevertheless tend to remain in the comfort zone of well-established Holocaust narratives while ignoring digital commemoration and education taking place at geographic and thematic margins. By focusing on the traditional master narrative of the Holocaust, we argue that the extant literature regarding digital Holocaust memory primarily serves to preserve the centrality of this narrative.","PeriodicalId":46140,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","volume":"26 1","pages":"151 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2023.2177489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent years, digital technologies have presented new opportunities for innovative Holocaust commemoration and education. Accordingly, scholars across disciplines have focused on “digital Holocaust memory” as a new frontier in both research and practice. But what exactly do they mean when they use this term? This article provides a systematic analysis of the literature regarding digital Holocaust memory as published in leading academic journals between 2010 and 2022. We position the digitalization of Holocaust memory within the context of the global evolution of memory culture and differentiate between the Holocaust’s “master narrative” and alternative, more peripheral Holocaust-related themes and perspectives. Scholars perceive the digitalization of Holocaust memory as enabling a new focus on marginal Holocaust-related narratives, but we demonstrate that they nevertheless tend to remain in the comfort zone of well-established Holocaust narratives while ignoring digital commemoration and education taking place at geographic and thematic margins. By focusing on the traditional master narrative of the Holocaust, we argue that the extant literature regarding digital Holocaust memory primarily serves to preserve the centrality of this narrative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当我们谈论数字大屠杀记忆时,我们谈论的是什么:2010-2022年学术期刊上发表的研究的系统分析
摘要近年来,数字技术为创新的大屠杀纪念和教育提供了新的机遇。因此,各学科的学者都将“数字大屠杀记忆”作为研究和实践的新前沿。但是当他们使用这个术语时,他们到底是什么意思呢?本文对2010年至2022年间发表在主流学术期刊上的关于数字大屠杀记忆的文献进行了系统分析。我们将大屠杀记忆的数字化置于记忆文化全球演变的背景下,并区分大屠杀的“主叙事”和其他更边缘的大屠杀相关主题和视角。学者们认为,大屠杀记忆的数字化使人们能够重新关注与大屠杀相关的边缘叙事,但我们证明,尽管如此,他们往往仍处于公认的大屠杀叙事的舒适区,而忽视了在地理和主题边缘进行的数字纪念和教育。通过关注大屠杀的传统主叙事,我们认为现存的关于数字大屠杀记忆的文献主要是为了维护这种叙事的中心地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COMMUNICATION REVIEW
COMMUNICATION REVIEW COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The assimilated secret: Understanding as silence in Japanese LGBT discourse Skilling communication: The discourse and metadiscourse of communication in self-help books Young climate activists in television news: An analysis of multimodal constructions of voice, political recognition, and co-optation Contexts and dimensions of algorithm literacies: parents’ algorithm literacies amidst the datafication of parenthood How U.S.-based children’s news show CNN 10 reproduces neoliberal hegemony: A critical discourse analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1