{"title":"The role of perceived organizational supports and management nationality amid physical Workplace's planned quality change","authors":"C.H.Ng Stephen","doi":"10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>That behavioral change is a prime outcome of planned quality change has been suggested for long, but little empirical evidence was available about how organizational factors affect the relationship. For a long time, the operations management literature has been dominated by the view that operations change-intervention is self-contained without considering the fit with the organizational environment. We contribute to this research line by arguing that change intervention's success is contingent upon organizational factors' status. Specifically, this study sheds light on how the relationship between 5S, a popular workplace change-intervention and its behavioral outcome is influenced by three organizational factors: perceived organization support (POS), perceived supervisory support (PSS), and management nationality. The result supports the hypothesis that the causal relationship between 5S intervention and employees' behavior is strengthened in the presence of POS and PSS. By assessing the measurement invariance between the Chinese operators of a Japanese-managed subsidiary and a Chinese-managed company, we find that the two operator groups shared the same conceptual framework of 5S but differed in their perceived implementation rigor. The operators of the Japanese-managed company implemented 5S intervention and performed self-discipline with a higher latent means level, indicating a greater 5S intensity and integration in the company. The result supports the hypothesis that management nationality matters when implementing workplace management intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46001,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Management Review","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 132-145"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1029313222000367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
That behavioral change is a prime outcome of planned quality change has been suggested for long, but little empirical evidence was available about how organizational factors affect the relationship. For a long time, the operations management literature has been dominated by the view that operations change-intervention is self-contained without considering the fit with the organizational environment. We contribute to this research line by arguing that change intervention's success is contingent upon organizational factors' status. Specifically, this study sheds light on how the relationship between 5S, a popular workplace change-intervention and its behavioral outcome is influenced by three organizational factors: perceived organization support (POS), perceived supervisory support (PSS), and management nationality. The result supports the hypothesis that the causal relationship between 5S intervention and employees' behavior is strengthened in the presence of POS and PSS. By assessing the measurement invariance between the Chinese operators of a Japanese-managed subsidiary and a Chinese-managed company, we find that the two operator groups shared the same conceptual framework of 5S but differed in their perceived implementation rigor. The operators of the Japanese-managed company implemented 5S intervention and performed self-discipline with a higher latent means level, indicating a greater 5S intensity and integration in the company. The result supports the hypothesis that management nationality matters when implementing workplace management intervention.
期刊介绍:
Asia Pacific Management Review (APMR), peer-reviewed and published quarterly, pursues to publish original and high quality research articles and notes that contribute to build empirical and theoretical understanding for concerning strategy and management aspects in business and activities. Meanwhile, we also seek to publish short communications and opinions addressing issues of current concern to managers in regards to within and between the Asia-Pacific region. The covered domains but not limited to, such as accounting, finance, marketing, decision analysis and operation management, human resource management, information management, international business management, logistic and supply chain management, quantitative and research methods, strategic and business management, and tourism management, are suitable for publication in the APMR.