Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings

Q3 Social Sciences Analise Psicologica Pub Date : 2022-06-14 DOI:10.14417/ap.1839
Layanne Vieira Linhares, A. Torres, C. Pereira
{"title":"Validation of the revised Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings","authors":"Layanne Vieira Linhares, A. Torres, C. Pereira","doi":"10.14417/ap.1839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of measures that assess individual differences in the Belief in a Just World plays an important role in advancing research in this area. The intent of this article was to validate a new version of the Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings (BJWPS), proposing that this measure may be an alternative to the original scale. For this, two studies were developed: Study 1 (N=160) aimed to presenting psychometric evidence for a new version of the BJWPS scale through an exploratory factor analysis. Study 2 (N=144) aimed to verify the goodness-of-fit of the proposed measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis. Results of the two studies indicated a single-factor structure that assesses BJW, which corroborates the theoretical frameworks of the BJW scales. Together, the results allow us to conclude that the BJWPS presented satisfactory psychometric indexes.","PeriodicalId":38440,"journal":{"name":"Analise Psicologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analise Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of measures that assess individual differences in the Belief in a Just World plays an important role in advancing research in this area. The intent of this article was to validate a new version of the Belief in a Just World Scale based on Popular Sayings (BJWPS), proposing that this measure may be an alternative to the original scale. For this, two studies were developed: Study 1 (N=160) aimed to presenting psychometric evidence for a new version of the BJWPS scale through an exploratory factor analysis. Study 2 (N=144) aimed to verify the goodness-of-fit of the proposed measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis. Results of the two studies indicated a single-factor structure that assesses BJW, which corroborates the theoretical frameworks of the BJW scales. Together, the results allow us to conclude that the BJWPS presented satisfactory psychometric indexes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于流行语的公正世界尺度修正信念的验证
在公正世界信念中评估个体差异的措施的发展在推进这一领域的研究方面发挥着重要作用。本文的目的是验证基于流行语的公正世界量表(BJWPS)的新版本,并提出该量表可能是原始量表的替代方案。为此,开展了两项研究:研究1 (N=160)旨在通过探索性因素分析为新版BJWPS量表提供心理测量证据。研究2 (N=144)旨在使用验证性因子分析验证所提出的测量模型的拟合优度。这两项研究的结果均显示出一种单因素结构,证实了BJW量表的理论框架。综上所述,BJWPS提供了令人满意的心理测量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analise Psicologica
Analise Psicologica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
The role of child, maternal and household factors in the reported use of physical punishment practices by Portuguese mothers Behavioral descriptions pretested for racial stereotypicality and valence: Data from an American and a Portuguese sample The mediating role of burnout syndrome between regulatory focus/motivation and intention to leave in teachers Associations between secure base script knowledge in early childhood and perceived quality of attachment in middle childhood Dominant Affective Temperaments and its variance among people with depression, bipolar disorder, and a non-clinical sample: Validation of the Affective Temperament Questionnaire (ATQ)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1