Anthelmintic resistance against gastrointestinal nematodes in beef cattle: effect on liveweight gain of grazing livestock in Mexico

IF 0.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-4162-12917
U. Libreros-Osorio, D. D. Vázquez-Arrieta, I. D. Limón, A. Patricio-Martínez, F. Patricio, A. Villa-Mancera
{"title":"Anthelmintic resistance against gastrointestinal nematodes in beef cattle: effect on liveweight gain of grazing livestock in Mexico","authors":"U. Libreros-Osorio, D. D. Vázquez-Arrieta, I. D. Limón, A. Patricio-Martínez, F. Patricio, A. Villa-Mancera","doi":"10.1590/1678-4162-12917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aimed to determine the efficacy and parasite resistance of levamisole (LV) and ivermectin (IVM) in beef cattle naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes, as well as the effect on the liveweight gain in a tropical wet region of Oaxaca, Mexico. From November 2019 to January 2020, sixty-six grazing calves were randomly allocated into three groups of twenty-two animals each, treated with LV or IVM or an untreated control group (day 0). Feces were collected 1 day before treatment and 15 days after treatment. The liveweight gain from each animal was recorded at days 0, 15, 30 and 45 post treatment. The LV group presented the highest reduction of eggs per gram (EPG) of feces, followed by the IVM group. Resistance to IVM was detected, although LV resistance was also suspected. The IVM group had significantly higher effective treatment at 93.5%, resulting in an increase (P<0.05) of liveweight gain of 16.1kg, followed by the LV group (92.4%) with 17.1kg, compared to the untreated control group. A significant (P < 0.05) negative correlation was observed between EPG and weight gain for the LV (�� = -0.46) and IVM groups (�� = -0.32). LV and IVM showed a lack of efficacy against gastrointestinal nematodes, as well as an adequate capacity for EPG reduction but with IVM resistance and detrimental effects on growth performance in grazing beef cattle.","PeriodicalId":8393,"journal":{"name":"Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-12917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to determine the efficacy and parasite resistance of levamisole (LV) and ivermectin (IVM) in beef cattle naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes, as well as the effect on the liveweight gain in a tropical wet region of Oaxaca, Mexico. From November 2019 to January 2020, sixty-six grazing calves were randomly allocated into three groups of twenty-two animals each, treated with LV or IVM or an untreated control group (day 0). Feces were collected 1 day before treatment and 15 days after treatment. The liveweight gain from each animal was recorded at days 0, 15, 30 and 45 post treatment. The LV group presented the highest reduction of eggs per gram (EPG) of feces, followed by the IVM group. Resistance to IVM was detected, although LV resistance was also suspected. The IVM group had significantly higher effective treatment at 93.5%, resulting in an increase (P<0.05) of liveweight gain of 16.1kg, followed by the LV group (92.4%) with 17.1kg, compared to the untreated control group. A significant (P < 0.05) negative correlation was observed between EPG and weight gain for the LV (�� = -0.46) and IVM groups (�� = -0.32). LV and IVM showed a lack of efficacy against gastrointestinal nematodes, as well as an adequate capacity for EPG reduction but with IVM resistance and detrimental effects on growth performance in grazing beef cattle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉牛对胃肠道线虫的抗药性:对墨西哥放牧牲畜增重的影响
摘要本研究旨在确定左旋咪唑(LV)和伊维菌素(IVM)对天然感染胃肠道线虫的肉牛的疗效和寄生虫耐药性,以及对墨西哥瓦哈卡热带潮湿地区肉牛活重增加的影响。2019年11月至2020年1月,将66头放牧犊牛随机分为3组,每组22头,分别给予LV或IVM治疗和未治疗对照组(第0天),分别于治疗前1天和治疗后15天收集粪便。记录各组动物在处理后第0、15、30和45天的活重增重。LV组每克粪便减卵量最高,IVM组次之。检测到对IVM的耐药性,尽管也怀疑LV耐药性。IVM组的有效治疗率为93.5%,显著高于未治疗对照组(P<0.05),活重增加16.1kg (P<0.05),其次是LV组(92.4%),与未治疗对照组相比增加17.1kg。LV组(-0.46)和IVM组(-0.32)EPG与体重增加呈显著负相关(P < 0.05)。在放牧肉牛中,LV和IVM对胃肠道线虫缺乏抑制作用,对EPG有足够的抑制能力,但对IVM有抗性,对生长性能有不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Publica artigos originais de pesquisa sobre temas de medicina veterinária, zootecnia, tecnologia e inspeção de produtos de origem animal e áreas afins relacionadas com a produção animal. Atualmente a revista mantém 628 permutas (419 internacionais e 209 nacionais), sendo um verdadeiro suporte para o recebimento de periódicos pela Biblioteca da Escola. A partir de 1999, a Escola de Veterinária delegou à FEP MVZ Editora o encargo do gerenciamento e edição de todas suas publicações, inclusive do Arquivo, ficando somente com o apoio logístico (instalações, equipamentos, pessoal etc.). O apoio financeiro é exercido pelo CNPq/FINEP e pela própria FEP MVZ.
期刊最新文献
In vitro antiparasitic activity of ethanolic leaves extract of Anethum graveolens Status of paratuberculosis in beef cattle In Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Reference intervals for metabolic profile of adult sheep in the tropics: over 12 months Histological and ultrastructural studies on the effect of Cassia alata methanolic leaf extracts against chemically induced lung adenocarcinoma in rats Presence of Cryptosporidium spp. in calves from dairy herds in Northern Antioquia, Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1