The governance of digital switchover of terrestrial television in the European Union: The role of policy framing

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Digital Media & Policy Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1386/JDMP.10.1.67_1
Krisztina Rozgonyi
{"title":"The governance of digital switchover of terrestrial television in the European Union: The role of policy framing","authors":"Krisztina Rozgonyi","doi":"10.1386/JDMP.10.1.67_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital switchover of (DSO) of terrestrial broadcasting constitutes one of the most critical moments of policy change in Europe because it offered a unique opportunity of reconceptualising public media space for the next era of communication. The promise of a plural and public service oriented broadcast policy legitimized efforts of citizens investing in digitization, provided public acceptance and approval to the changes set to terminate analogue television. This article explores the policy framing of the switchover process in the European Union. It finds that DSO was constructed around overly technical and economic frames in the policy, a strategy, which allowed building an argument of neutrality of technology and hence of the steps policy-makers were making. This construction did not address the exclusion and side-lining of the social and political consequences of free-to-air reduction. The article argues that this practice provided a low-conflict policy process led by the European Commission between 2005 and 2015 and showcased a paradox on European spectrum policy. The article further argues that the governance of digitalization of Europe’s screens presents a case of highly complex low-salience regulatory policy, which means muted participation of citizens and limited public debate. Ultimately, this strategy undermines democratic practice and meaningful transparency in European policy-making as it eliminates deliberations on what constitutes public interest in the 21st media context. The analyses of communication DSO policy as a matter of polity situate well with European media governance scholarship.","PeriodicalId":40702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Media & Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1386/JDMP.10.1.67_1","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Media & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JDMP.10.1.67_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Digital switchover of (DSO) of terrestrial broadcasting constitutes one of the most critical moments of policy change in Europe because it offered a unique opportunity of reconceptualising public media space for the next era of communication. The promise of a plural and public service oriented broadcast policy legitimized efforts of citizens investing in digitization, provided public acceptance and approval to the changes set to terminate analogue television. This article explores the policy framing of the switchover process in the European Union. It finds that DSO was constructed around overly technical and economic frames in the policy, a strategy, which allowed building an argument of neutrality of technology and hence of the steps policy-makers were making. This construction did not address the exclusion and side-lining of the social and political consequences of free-to-air reduction. The article argues that this practice provided a low-conflict policy process led by the European Commission between 2005 and 2015 and showcased a paradox on European spectrum policy. The article further argues that the governance of digitalization of Europe’s screens presents a case of highly complex low-salience regulatory policy, which means muted participation of citizens and limited public debate. Ultimately, this strategy undermines democratic practice and meaningful transparency in European policy-making as it eliminates deliberations on what constitutes public interest in the 21st media context. The analyses of communication DSO policy as a matter of polity situate well with European media governance scholarship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟地面电视数字切换的管理:政策制定的作用
地面广播的数字转换(DSO)是欧洲政策变化的最关键时刻之一,因为它为下一个通信时代重新构想公共媒体空间提供了独特的机会。多元化和面向公共服务的广播政策的承诺使公民投资数字化的努力合法化,使公众接受和批准了终止模拟电视的变化。本文探讨了欧盟转换过程的政策框架。它发现,DSO是围绕政策中的过度技术和经济框架构建的,这是一种战略,允许建立技术中立性的论点,因此是政策制定者正在制定的步骤。这种说法并没有解决减少免费电视的社会和政治后果的排斥和边缘化问题。文章认为,这种做法在2005年至2015年期间提供了一个由欧盟委员会领导的低冲突政策过程,并展示了欧洲频谱政策的悖论。文章进一步认为,欧洲屏幕数字化的治理呈现出一种高度复杂的低显著性监管政策,这意味着公民的沉默参与和有限的公众辩论。最终,这种策略破坏了民主实践和欧洲政策制定中有意义的透明度,因为它消除了对21世纪媒体背景下构成公共利益的审议。对传播DSO政策作为一种政治问题的分析,在欧洲媒体治理研究中处于有利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The concept of ‘new media’ among Jordanian news producers Digital disruption and global businesses’ viability under COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic Platform governance and the politics of media regulation: The review of the European Audiovisual Media Services Directive Intermediary roles in the transposition of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive into domestic legislation: Evidence from Spain European audiovisual media policy in the age of global video on demand services: A case study of Netflix in the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1