Nancy Kingsbury Wollstonecraft and the Logic of Freedom as Independence

IF 0.7 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1353/hph.2023.0021
Alan M. S. J. Coffee
{"title":"Nancy Kingsbury Wollstonecraft and the Logic of Freedom as Independence","authors":"Alan M. S. J. Coffee","doi":"10.1353/hph.2023.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:When the writings of Nancy Kingsbury Wollstonecraft surfaced in 2019, having been almost wholly neglected by scholars since their publication in the 1820s, they invited an inevitable and tantalizing comparison with her far more famous sister-in-law, Mary Wollstonecraft, especially since Kingsbury had written an article on \"The Natural Rights of Woman.\" Irrespective of the Wollstonecraft connection, however, Kingsbury's writing stands on its own merits as deserving of serious scholarship by historians of women in philosophy. Nevertheless, reading Kingsbury in the light of her predecessor is highly instructive and helps both bring out what is distinctive about her conclusions and place her in the context of post-Wollstonecraftian thought in the nineteenth century. Kingsbury draws on a similar set of foundational principles as Wollstonecraft, which I place within the republican tradition of political philosophy—freedom, equality, virtue, the common good. Together, these make up an ideal of freedom as independence. Focusing on the issue of education, she argues that increasing women's access to education will do little to improve their intellectual development unless there is an accompanying and extensive restructuring of social and economic norms. In applying the logic of freedom as independence, Kingsbury takes further this aspect of Wollstonecraft's thought and anticipates and prefigures some of the later arguments of feminists and abolitionists writing in the same tradition, including especially Frederick Douglass.","PeriodicalId":46448,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":"61 1","pages":"257 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.0021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:When the writings of Nancy Kingsbury Wollstonecraft surfaced in 2019, having been almost wholly neglected by scholars since their publication in the 1820s, they invited an inevitable and tantalizing comparison with her far more famous sister-in-law, Mary Wollstonecraft, especially since Kingsbury had written an article on "The Natural Rights of Woman." Irrespective of the Wollstonecraft connection, however, Kingsbury's writing stands on its own merits as deserving of serious scholarship by historians of women in philosophy. Nevertheless, reading Kingsbury in the light of her predecessor is highly instructive and helps both bring out what is distinctive about her conclusions and place her in the context of post-Wollstonecraftian thought in the nineteenth century. Kingsbury draws on a similar set of foundational principles as Wollstonecraft, which I place within the republican tradition of political philosophy—freedom, equality, virtue, the common good. Together, these make up an ideal of freedom as independence. Focusing on the issue of education, she argues that increasing women's access to education will do little to improve their intellectual development unless there is an accompanying and extensive restructuring of social and economic norms. In applying the logic of freedom as independence, Kingsbury takes further this aspect of Wollstonecraft's thought and anticipates and prefigures some of the later arguments of feminists and abolitionists writing in the same tradition, including especially Frederick Douglass.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南希·金斯伯里·沃斯通克拉夫特和自由即独立的逻辑
摘要:南希·金斯伯里-沃斯通克拉夫特的作品自19世纪20年代出版以来几乎完全被学者忽视,2019年,当这些作品浮出水面时,他们不可避免地将其与她著名得多的嫂子玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特进行了诱人的比较,尤其是因为金斯伯里写了一篇关于“女性的自然权利”的文章。“然而,不管与沃斯通克拉夫特的联系如何,金斯伯里的作品本身就值得女性哲学历史学家认真研究。然而,从她的前任的角度阅读金斯伯里是非常有启发性的,既有助于揭示她的结论的独特之处,也有助于将她置于十九世纪。金斯伯里借鉴了与沃斯通克拉夫特相似的一套基本原则,我将其置于共和政治哲学传统中——自由、平等、美德、共同利益。这些共同构成了自由即独立的理想。在关注教育问题时,她认为,除非伴随着社会和经济规范的广泛重组,否则增加妇女接受教育的机会对改善她们的智力发展几乎没有帮助。在运用自由即独立的逻辑时,金斯伯里进一步探讨了沃斯通克拉夫特思想的这一方面,并预见和预示了女权主义者和废奴主义者在同一传统中写作的一些后来的论点,尤其是弗雷德里克·道格拉斯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Since January 2002, the Journal of the History of Philosophy has been published by The Johns Hopkins University Press. For subscriptions, change of address, and back issues, please contact Subscription Services. In addition to photocopying allowed by the "fair use" doctrine, JHP authorizes personal or educational multiple-copying by instructors for use within a course. This policy does not cover photocopying for commercial use either by individuals or publishers. All such uses must be authorized by JHP.
期刊最新文献
Mill on Moral Rules in "Whewell on Moral Philosophy" Généalogie de la liberté by Olivier Boulnois (review) Philosophy and Religion in Plato's Dialogues by Andrea Nightingale (review) Dark Matters: Pessimism and the Problem of Suffering by Mara van der Lugt (review) Pragmatism's Evolution: Organism and Environment in American Philosophy by Trevor Pearce (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1