Brief resilience interventions for mental health among college students: Randomized controlled trial

Shabnam Kadian, J. Joseph, Sat Pal, Rajeshwari Devi
{"title":"Brief resilience interventions for mental health among college students: Randomized controlled trial","authors":"Shabnam Kadian, J. Joseph, Sat Pal, Rajeshwari Devi","doi":"10.4103/shb.shb_28_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The resilience interventions have the potential to enhance the protective factors to prevent mental health problems in young adolescents. The present study evaluated the feasibility of brief resilience interventions in a sample of college students. Methods: The present randomized controlled study was conducted among 220 college students and the study protocol was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India (Ref.No.CTRI/2021/04/032716). The participants were randomly allocated to two groups: (i) A brief resilience intervention program group and (ii) a resilience self-help pamphlet group. The brief resilience intervention program is based on positive psychology and consists of two sessions, delivered on a 2-week interval period. The outcome measures were changes in the scores of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS), Perceived Stress Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire-4. Results: The mean age of the participants was 19.31 years (standard deviation – 1.17) and both the study groups were comparable during baseline (P > 0.05). At the 1-month follow-up, there was a slight increase in the mean BRCS scores of the brief resilience intervention group (15.57 vs. 15.87) as compared to the resilience self-help pamphlet group (16.15 vs. 15.79). There was no evidence that brief resilience intervention was superior to the self-help booklet in any of the outcome measures (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Brief resilience interventions have the potential to promote resilience and coping skills among college-going students in this setting. The integration of brief resilience interventions among college-based cohorts would appear to be an appropriate strategy for building protective factors to bolster resilience.","PeriodicalId":34783,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/shb.shb_28_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: The resilience interventions have the potential to enhance the protective factors to prevent mental health problems in young adolescents. The present study evaluated the feasibility of brief resilience interventions in a sample of college students. Methods: The present randomized controlled study was conducted among 220 college students and the study protocol was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India (Ref.No.CTRI/2021/04/032716). The participants were randomly allocated to two groups: (i) A brief resilience intervention program group and (ii) a resilience self-help pamphlet group. The brief resilience intervention program is based on positive psychology and consists of two sessions, delivered on a 2-week interval period. The outcome measures were changes in the scores of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS), Perceived Stress Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire-4. Results: The mean age of the participants was 19.31 years (standard deviation – 1.17) and both the study groups were comparable during baseline (P > 0.05). At the 1-month follow-up, there was a slight increase in the mean BRCS scores of the brief resilience intervention group (15.57 vs. 15.87) as compared to the resilience self-help pamphlet group (16.15 vs. 15.79). There was no evidence that brief resilience intervention was superior to the self-help booklet in any of the outcome measures (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Brief resilience interventions have the potential to promote resilience and coping skills among college-going students in this setting. The integration of brief resilience interventions among college-based cohorts would appear to be an appropriate strategy for building protective factors to bolster resilience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生心理健康的短期弹性干预:随机对照试验
引言:弹性干预有可能增强青少年心理健康问题的保护因素。本研究以大学生为样本,评估短期弹性干预的可行性。方法:本研究在220名大学生中进行随机对照研究,研究方案已在印度临床试验登记处注册(参考文献号:ctri /2021/04/032716)。参与者被随机分为两组:(i)一个简短的弹性干预计划组和(ii)一个弹性自助小册子组。这个简短的恢复力干预项目是基于积极心理学的,包括两个疗程,每隔两周进行一次。结果测量为简短弹性应对量表(BRCS)、感知压力量表和患者健康问卷-4得分的变化。结果:参与者的平均年龄为19.31岁(标准差- 1.17),两个研究组在基线时具有可比性(P < 0.05)。在1个月的随访中,与弹性自助手册组(16.15比15.79)相比,短暂弹性干预组的BRCS平均得分略有增加(15.57比15.87)。没有证据表明短期恢复力干预在任何结果测量中都优于自助手册(P < 0.05)。结论:在此背景下,简短的心理弹性干预有可能提高大学生的心理弹性和应对技能。在以大学为基础的队列中整合短暂的恢复力干预措施似乎是建立保护因素以增强恢复力的适当策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior
Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Food Insecurity, Challenges, and Strategies among New Mexicans Experiencing Job Disruptions during COVID-19: A Cross-sectional Study College Students' Readiness to Change in Physical Inactivity Behavior using Perfection Quotient Behavioral Model Content Analysis of Social Media Posts about the Bayanihan e-Konsulta Program during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case in the Philippines Should sex education in the Philippines remain taboo? Social networking sites usage and quality of life among senior citizens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1