Sorana Mureșanu, M. Hedeșiu, C. Dinu, R. Roman, O. Almășan
{"title":"Digital occlusal splints for temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review","authors":"Sorana Mureșanu, M. Hedeșiu, C. Dinu, R. Roman, O. Almășan","doi":"10.37897/rjs.2022.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. This systematic review aimed at assessing the therapeutic efficacy of computer-assisted or digitally constructed occlusal splints in comparison to conventional splint treatment for temporomandibular disorders or bruxism. Material and methods. The study was prospectively registered in the Open Science Framework. Four electronic databases, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, were searched comprehensively. The following keywords were employed: “3D-printed”, “additive manufacture”, “computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing”, “temporomandibular joint”, “temporomandibular joint dysfunction”, “bruxism”, “disc displacement”, “temporo-mandibular disorder”, “splint’, “oral splint”, “occlusal splint”, “occlusal device”, “bite splint”, “occlusal appliance”. Two risk of bias evaluation instruments were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Outcomes. Following the application of the search strategy, a total of 557 publications were identified in the electronic databases. Seven eligible articles were finally included in the analysis. Six publications (85.7%) compared digitally manufactured occlusal splints to conventionally created splints, while one examined if the use of a facebow influences the performance of digital splints. Visual assessment scores or numerical rating scales of pain, optical axiography, tooth wear, and bruxism frequency were reported as outcomes. Conclusions. Computer aided design occlusal splints provide equivalent outcomes to traditional splints. Some generated superior results, mainly probable as a result of the virtual articulator's greater precision and the splint materials' material qualities.","PeriodicalId":33514,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjs.2022.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives. This systematic review aimed at assessing the therapeutic efficacy of computer-assisted or digitally constructed occlusal splints in comparison to conventional splint treatment for temporomandibular disorders or bruxism. Material and methods. The study was prospectively registered in the Open Science Framework. Four electronic databases, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, were searched comprehensively. The following keywords were employed: “3D-printed”, “additive manufacture”, “computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing”, “temporomandibular joint”, “temporomandibular joint dysfunction”, “bruxism”, “disc displacement”, “temporo-mandibular disorder”, “splint’, “oral splint”, “occlusal splint”, “occlusal device”, “bite splint”, “occlusal appliance”. Two risk of bias evaluation instruments were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Outcomes. Following the application of the search strategy, a total of 557 publications were identified in the electronic databases. Seven eligible articles were finally included in the analysis. Six publications (85.7%) compared digitally manufactured occlusal splints to conventionally created splints, while one examined if the use of a facebow influences the performance of digital splints. Visual assessment scores or numerical rating scales of pain, optical axiography, tooth wear, and bruxism frequency were reported as outcomes. Conclusions. Computer aided design occlusal splints provide equivalent outcomes to traditional splints. Some generated superior results, mainly probable as a result of the virtual articulator's greater precision and the splint materials' material qualities.
目标。本系统综述旨在评估计算机辅助或数字构建的咬合夹板与传统夹板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱或磨牙症的疗效。材料和方法。该研究前瞻性地登记在开放科学框架中。对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Scopus四个电子数据库进行了综合检索。采用以下关键词:“3D打印”、“增材制造”、“计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造”、,“咬合矫治器”。使用两种偏倚风险评估工具来评估纳入研究的质量。结果。在采用搜索战略后,电子数据库中共发现557份出版物。七篇符合条件的文章最终被纳入分析。六份出版物(85.7%)将数字制造的咬合夹板与传统制造的夹板进行了比较,其中一份研究了面弓的使用是否会影响数字夹板的性能。结果报告了疼痛、光学轴位成像、牙齿磨损和磨牙症频率的视觉评估分数或数字评定量表。结论。计算机辅助设计咬合夹板提供了与传统夹板相同的效果。一些产生了优越的结果,主要可能是由于虚拟咬合架的更高精度和夹板材料的材料质量。