Household risk‐sharing channels

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Quantitative Economics Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.3982/qe1000
Pierfederico Asdrubali, Simone Tedeschi, L. Ventura
{"title":"Household risk‐sharing channels","authors":"Pierfederico Asdrubali, Simone Tedeschi, L. Ventura","doi":"10.3982/qe1000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to fill the gaps in the analysis of risk‐sharing channels at the microlevel, both within and across households. Using data from the Bank of Italy's Survey on Household Income and Wealth covering the financial crisis, we are able to quantify in a unified and consistent framework several risk‐sharing mechanisms that so far have been documented separately. We find that Italian households were able to smooth on average about 85% of shocks to household head's earnings in both 2008–2010 and 2010–2012 spells. The most important smoothing mechanisms turn out to be self‐insurance through savings/dissavings (40% and 47% in 2008–2010 and 2010–2012, respectively), and within‐household risk‐sharing (16% and 14%). Interestingly, risk‐sharing through portfolio diversification and private transfers is rather limited, but the overall percentage of shock absorption occurring through private risk‐sharing channels hovers around four‐fifths, as opposed to around one‐fifth of a shock cushioned by taxes and public transfers, excluding pensions. In addition, by exploiting subjective expectations on the following year's household income, we find significant evidence of a lower degree of smoothing of persistent shocks. \n \nHousehold risk‐sharing precautionary savings consumption smoothing income smoothing C31 D12 E21","PeriodicalId":46811,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Economics","volume":"11 1","pages":"1109-1142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3982/qe1000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper aims to fill the gaps in the analysis of risk‐sharing channels at the microlevel, both within and across households. Using data from the Bank of Italy's Survey on Household Income and Wealth covering the financial crisis, we are able to quantify in a unified and consistent framework several risk‐sharing mechanisms that so far have been documented separately. We find that Italian households were able to smooth on average about 85% of shocks to household head's earnings in both 2008–2010 and 2010–2012 spells. The most important smoothing mechanisms turn out to be self‐insurance through savings/dissavings (40% and 47% in 2008–2010 and 2010–2012, respectively), and within‐household risk‐sharing (16% and 14%). Interestingly, risk‐sharing through portfolio diversification and private transfers is rather limited, but the overall percentage of shock absorption occurring through private risk‐sharing channels hovers around four‐fifths, as opposed to around one‐fifth of a shock cushioned by taxes and public transfers, excluding pensions. In addition, by exploiting subjective expectations on the following year's household income, we find significant evidence of a lower degree of smoothing of persistent shocks. Household risk‐sharing precautionary savings consumption smoothing income smoothing C31 D12 E21
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭风险分担渠道
本文旨在填补微观层面风险分担渠道分析中的空白,包括家庭内部和家庭之间的风险分担渠道。利用意大利银行涵盖金融危机的家庭收入和财富调查数据,我们能够在一个统一一致的框架中量化迄今为止单独记录的几种风险分担机制。我们发现,在2008-2010年和2010-2011年期间,意大利家庭平均能够消除约85%的户主收入冲击。最重要的平滑机制是通过储蓄/储蓄进行的自我保险(2008-2010年和2010-2011年分别为40%和47%),以及家庭内部风险分担(16%和14%)。有趣的是,通过投资组合多元化和私人转移承担的风险相当有限,但通过私人风险分担渠道吸收冲击的总体百分比徘徊在五分之四左右,而税收和公共转移(不包括养老金)缓冲的冲击约为五分之一。此外,通过利用对下一年家庭收入的主观预期,我们发现了持续冲击的平滑程度较低的重要证据。家庭风险分担预防性储蓄消费平滑收入平滑C31 D12 E21
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geometric methods for finite rational inattention Measuring trust in institutions and its causal effect A robust permutation test for subvector inference in linear regressions Difficulties in testing for capital overaccumulation Bootstrapping Laplace transforms of volatility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1