{"title":"Vertical fiscal externality in public education inputs: When federal and state governments have different time perspectives","authors":"Hideya Kato , Mitsuyoshi Yanagihara","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates how equilibrium under a unitary nation can be achieved through fiscal transfer from (to) the federal government to (from) the state government when both levels of government supply public education to immobile residents under a simple endogenous growth framework fueled by human capital accumulation. We introduce the different time perspectives of both levels of government as a key consideration. Although both levels of government are interested in both the utility level of the present generation and the growth rate that can be attained by accumulating human capital through education, they place different weight on the value of these objectives. We first show that the federal government can replicate the equilibrium outcome that can be achieved under a unitary nation by implementing fiscal transfer between the different levels of government. Second, if the federal government places a large weight on the growth rate, or has a more long-run perspective than the state government, the federal tax rate becomes positive. Third, as the federal government has a stronger long-run perspective, fiscal transfer from the federal government to the state government increases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"77 4","pages":"Pages 518-525"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944323000601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates how equilibrium under a unitary nation can be achieved through fiscal transfer from (to) the federal government to (from) the state government when both levels of government supply public education to immobile residents under a simple endogenous growth framework fueled by human capital accumulation. We introduce the different time perspectives of both levels of government as a key consideration. Although both levels of government are interested in both the utility level of the present generation and the growth rate that can be attained by accumulating human capital through education, they place different weight on the value of these objectives. We first show that the federal government can replicate the equilibrium outcome that can be achieved under a unitary nation by implementing fiscal transfer between the different levels of government. Second, if the federal government places a large weight on the growth rate, or has a more long-run perspective than the state government, the federal tax rate becomes positive. Third, as the federal government has a stronger long-run perspective, fiscal transfer from the federal government to the state government increases.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.