{"title":"Trans (legal) parenthood and the gender of legal parenthood","authors":"Alan Brown","doi":"10.1017/lst.2023.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Trans identities are increasingly subjected to contentious public and political debate in the UK, and this has resulted in resource to the law across various contexts. Against that background, this paper considers trans legal parenthood after the decision in R (McConnell and YY) v Registrar General for England and Wales. This judgment held that a trans man who gave birth was the legal ‘mother’ of his child. The wider consequence is that trans legal parenthood will not reflect trans identities, but birth-assigned sex/gender, regardless of whether the parent holds a gender recognition certificate. Separate from this underlying social and political context concerning trans identities, the paper argues that legal parenthood is a flexible and pragmatic concept, which lacks inherent normative content, and which has previously proved capable of accommodating a variety of different familial and reproductive circumstances. The paper argues that the gendered descriptors of ‘mother’ and ‘father’, while remaining the law's default, are not inherent to legal parenthood. Thus, the paper concludes that, despite the ongoing political and cultural debates concerning trans identities, the existing concept of legal parenthood is capable of properly recognising trans parenthood, without requiring any fundamental changes to the concept itself.","PeriodicalId":46121,"journal":{"name":"Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2023.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Trans identities are increasingly subjected to contentious public and political debate in the UK, and this has resulted in resource to the law across various contexts. Against that background, this paper considers trans legal parenthood after the decision in R (McConnell and YY) v Registrar General for England and Wales. This judgment held that a trans man who gave birth was the legal ‘mother’ of his child. The wider consequence is that trans legal parenthood will not reflect trans identities, but birth-assigned sex/gender, regardless of whether the parent holds a gender recognition certificate. Separate from this underlying social and political context concerning trans identities, the paper argues that legal parenthood is a flexible and pragmatic concept, which lacks inherent normative content, and which has previously proved capable of accommodating a variety of different familial and reproductive circumstances. The paper argues that the gendered descriptors of ‘mother’ and ‘father’, while remaining the law's default, are not inherent to legal parenthood. Thus, the paper concludes that, despite the ongoing political and cultural debates concerning trans identities, the existing concept of legal parenthood is capable of properly recognising trans parenthood, without requiring any fundamental changes to the concept itself.
在英国,跨性别身份越来越受到有争议的公众和政治辩论的影响,这为不同背景下的法律提供了资源。在这种背景下,本文在R(McConnell and YY)诉英格兰和威尔士注册总署一案的裁决后考虑了跨法律父母身份。该判决认定,一名生育的跨性别男子是其孩子的合法“母亲”。更广泛的后果是,跨性别合法父母身份不会反映跨性别身份,而是出生时指定的性别/性别,无论父母是否持有性别承认证书。与跨性别身份相关的潜在社会和政治背景不同,本文认为,合法父母身份是一个灵活而务实的概念,缺乏固有的规范内容,而且以前已经证明能够适应各种不同的家庭和生殖环境。该论文认为,“母亲”和“父亲”的性别描述虽然仍然是法律的默认,但并不是合法父母所固有的。因此,该论文得出结论,尽管关于跨性别身份的政治和文化辩论仍在进行,但现有的合法父母身份概念能够正确承认跨性别父母身份,而不需要对概念本身进行任何根本性的改变。