Reckoning with theoretical research: A heuristic for gauging and writing public administration theory

Q1 Social Sciences Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10841806.2023.2186815
Nuri Heckler, Ryan Rouse
{"title":"Reckoning with theoretical research: A heuristic for gauging and writing public administration theory","authors":"Nuri Heckler, Ryan Rouse","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2023.2186815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract When theorizing, it is sometimes colloquially said “I reckon…” This essay attempts to reckon with theorizing by proposing a heuristic for systematically gauging rigorous and/or meaningful theoretical research with the analysis of eight factors: novelty, challenge, relevance, power, fecundity, usefulness, deliberateness, and clarity. These factors offer a manual for theorists writing theoretical research, and a loose set of considerations to begin discussions of what it is that makes invigorating theory.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"45 1","pages":"6 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2023.2186815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract When theorizing, it is sometimes colloquially said “I reckon…” This essay attempts to reckon with theorizing by proposing a heuristic for systematically gauging rigorous and/or meaningful theoretical research with the analysis of eight factors: novelty, challenge, relevance, power, fecundity, usefulness, deliberateness, and clarity. These factors offer a manual for theorists writing theoretical research, and a loose set of considerations to begin discussions of what it is that makes invigorating theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理论研究的清算:公共行政理论计量与写作的启发
本文试图通过提出一种启发式方法,系统地衡量严谨和/或有意义的理论研究,分析八个因素:新颖性、挑战性、相关性、权力、多产性、有用性、慎重性和清晰度,从而对理论化进行评估。这些因素为理论家撰写理论研究提供了一本手册,并提供了一套松散的考虑因素,以开始讨论是什么使理论充满活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Administrative Theory and Praxis
Administrative Theory and Praxis Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Farewell, and thanks for the memories Reckoning with theoretical research: A heuristic for gauging and writing public administration theory Meaningful knowledge about public administration: Epistemological and methodological antecedents Theory and practice in dis-harmony? Toward a praxis ecosystem approach to the public administration and management discipline and profession ATP celebrates 45 years: A dialogue series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1