The centrality of Africa in Lenin’s theory of imperialism

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Review of African Political Economy Pub Date : 2022-01-24 DOI:10.1080/03056244.2022.2026765
J. Pateman
{"title":"The centrality of Africa in Lenin’s theory of imperialism","authors":"J. Pateman","doi":"10.1080/03056244.2022.2026765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Lenin’s Marxist theories have aided both African anti-imperialist struggles and the study of African political economy. Recently, however, some scholars have reinvigorated the postcolonial critique of Marxism as a Eurocentric doctrine, one that misunderstands and marginalises Africa and its peoples. Following Cedric Robinson, several analysts mention Lenin alongside Marx and Engels as a founder of Eurocentric Marxism. This article, by contrast, argues that Lenin displayed a deep concern for Africa, one that was fundamentally non-Eurocentric. Lenin researched Africa extensively in his Notebooks on imperialism. Upon the basis of this research, Lenin placed Africa at the centre of his analysis in Imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism. It is impossible to understand the insights of Lenin’s theory of imperialism without appreciating Africa’s centrality within it. Although Lenin displayed the racist views of Africa that dominated his era, these were marginal in his thought. Lenin militantly opposed colonialism and supported African independence.","PeriodicalId":47526,"journal":{"name":"Review of African Political Economy","volume":"49 1","pages":"287 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of African Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2022.2026765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lenin’s Marxist theories have aided both African anti-imperialist struggles and the study of African political economy. Recently, however, some scholars have reinvigorated the postcolonial critique of Marxism as a Eurocentric doctrine, one that misunderstands and marginalises Africa and its peoples. Following Cedric Robinson, several analysts mention Lenin alongside Marx and Engels as a founder of Eurocentric Marxism. This article, by contrast, argues that Lenin displayed a deep concern for Africa, one that was fundamentally non-Eurocentric. Lenin researched Africa extensively in his Notebooks on imperialism. Upon the basis of this research, Lenin placed Africa at the centre of his analysis in Imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism. It is impossible to understand the insights of Lenin’s theory of imperialism without appreciating Africa’s centrality within it. Although Lenin displayed the racist views of Africa that dominated his era, these were marginal in his thought. Lenin militantly opposed colonialism and supported African independence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲在列宁帝国主义理论中的中心地位
列宁的马克思主义理论对非洲反帝国主义斗争和非洲政治经济研究都有帮助。然而,最近,一些学者重新激活了对马克思主义的后殖民批评,认为这是一种以欧洲为中心的学说,误解和边缘化了非洲及其人民。继塞德里克·罗宾逊之后,几位分析人士将列宁与马克思和恩格斯一起列为欧洲中心主义的创始人。相比之下,这篇文章认为列宁对非洲表现出深切的关注,这种关注从根本上来说是非欧洲中心的。列宁在《帝国主义札记》中对非洲进行了广泛的研究。在这一研究的基础上,列宁将非洲置于他在《帝国主义:资本主义的最高阶段》一书中分析的中心。如果不认识到非洲在其中的中心地位,就不可能理解列宁帝国主义理论的深刻见解。虽然列宁对非洲的种族主义观点在他的时代占主导地位,但这些观点在他的思想中是边缘的。列宁坚决反对殖民主义,支持非洲独立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Review of African Political Economy (ROAPE) is a refereed journal committed to encouraging high quality research and fostering excellence in the understanding of African political economy. Published quarterly by Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group for the ROAPE international collective it has since 1974 provided radical analysis of trends and issues in Africa. It has paid particular attention to the political economy of inequality, exploitation and oppression, whether driven by global forces or local ones (such as class, race, community and gender), and to materialist interpretations of change in Africa. It has sustained a critical analysis of the nature of power and the state in Africa.
期刊最新文献
Resource nationalism and energy transitions in lower-income countries: the case of Tanzania Speaking out, talking back? African feminist politics and decolonial poetics of knowing, organising and loving South Africa’s unjust climate reparations: a critique of the Just Energy Transition Partnership How capitalism is destroying the Horn of Africa: sheep and the crises in Somalia and Sudan (Un)Just transition in power generation: neoliberal reforms and climate crisis in Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1